Health Ralph Nader

Ralph Nader: Democrats Are Betraying Voters on Medicare

Where is the outcry among Democratic politicians to reverse completely the corporate takeover of Medicare?
[ufcw770 / CC BY 2.0]

By Ralph Nader

Do you remember the promises made by the Democratic Party’s presidential and Congressional candidates on universal health insurance? You can forget their pledges and somber convictions now that your votes put the Democrats in charge of the House and the Senate. The Democrats’ leaders are abandoning their promises and retreating into a cowardly corporatist future.

Here is the present scene. Leading Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, have decided to spend tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize the giant health insurance companies like Aetna and United Healthcare to “cover recently laid-off workers and those who purchase their own coverage,” as The New York Times reported. There are no price restraints on the gouging insurance premiums or loophole-ridden policies. That is why giant corporate socialist insurers love the “American Rescue Plan,” which gives them socialist cash on the barrelhead. The law lets insurers decide how and whether they pay healthcare bills with co-pays, deductibles, or grant waivers. All these anti-consumer details are buried in the endless and inscrutable fine print.

Whatever happened to the Democrats’ (Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pramila Jayapal, etc.) demand for single-payer – everybody in, nobody out – with free choice of doctors and hospitals instead of the existing cruel, and profiteering industry for which enough is never enough? Senator Sanders often mentioned a Yale study, published on February 15, 2020, that found:

“Although health care expenditure per capita is higher in the USA than in any other country, more than 37 million Americans do not have health insurance, and 41 million more have inadequate access to care. Efforts are ongoing to repeal the Affordable Care Act which would exacerbate health-care inequities. By contrast, a universal system, such as that proposed in the Medicare for All Act, has the potential to transform the availability and efficiency of American health-care services. Taking into account both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure, equivalent to more than $450 billion annually….” (See the study: Improving the Prognosis of Health Care in the USA, February 15, 2020).

Well, House Speaker Pelosi is discouraging House Democrats from supporting Representative Pramila Jayapal’s H.R. 1384, Medicare for All Act of 2019, the gold standard for single-payer. News reports indicate that Representative Jayapal (D-WA) and Representative. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) will reintroduce their Medicare for All bill next week. Speaker Pelosi is telling Democrats in the House to focus instead on the modest expansion of Obamacare with its corporate welfare, utter complexity and seriously inadequate coverage. Almost eighty million Americans are presently uninsured or underinsured – a level that will not be significantly reduced for deprived workers by tweaking Obamacare during the Covid-19 pandemic.

A modified Obamacare, with no price ceilings, will hardly reduce the tens of thousands of American deaths every year because people cannot afford health insurance to get diagnosed and treated in time to prevent fatalities. The Yale study also found that: “ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68,000 lives and 1.73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.” Tweaking Obamacare does little to stem the relentless surge in healthcare prices and profits in our country, which is unique for not placing billing ceilings on medical procedures and drugs. This “get whatever you can” behavior by the vendors is so uncontrolled that healthcare billing fraud and abuse is costing people one billion dollars A DAY! Malcolm Sparrow, who is an applied mathematician at Harvard, estimates medical billing fraud amounts to at least ten percent of all healthcare expenses each year.

Obamacare does nothing to limit the perverse incentives of a fee-for-service system that includes unnecessary operations, over-diagnosis, and over-prescribing all of which increase the risks of preventable casualties. A Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine peer-reviewed study in 2016 estimates that close to 5000 lives are lost weekly due to such “preventable problems” just in hospitals (see: Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S., May 3, 2016).

It gets worse. Year after year, the corporate Democrats, along with the Republicans, are facilitating expanding corporate takeovers of Medicare and Medicaid. The giant and widening attack on Medicare is called “Medicare Advantage,” which more accurately should be called “Medicare [Dis]advantage.” Our corporatized government, under both Parties, has been allowing deceptive promotional seductions of elderly people to take Medicare [Dis]advantage – now fully 40% of all Medicare beneficiaries – which is just a corporate insurance plan with multiple undisclosed tripwires.

Former President Trump worsened what he inherited from the Democrats in outsourcing Medicare. He launched something called “direct contracting” that, “could fully turn Medicare over to private health insurers” declared Diane Archer, former chair of Consumer Reports, in her article on March 8, 2021. Medicare Advantage premiums can be pricey. According to Kay Tillow, Executive Director of the Nurses Professional Organization, “The Medicare Advantage Plans are smiling all the way to the bank. In 2019 each Medicare Advantage beneficiary cost taxpayers $11,822 while those in original Medicare cost $10,813 each – that’s over $1,000 more and over 9% more per person for the for-profit insurers!”

Where is the outcry among Democratic politicians to reverse completely the corporate takeover of Medicare? Last year, many Democratic candidates pontificated about the need for single-payer health insurance, but now in Congress, we are scarcely hearing a peep about this vital human right. Their campaign rhetoric is just distant memory. Tragically, it is now harder than ever for the elderly to get out of Medicare [Dis]advantage and go back to traditional Medicare.

Millions of elderly people are deceived by televised marketing lies and slick brochures.  The hapless Federal Trade Commission (FTC) should investigate and end the deceptions. Congressional investigations and hearings are long overdue. As the authoritative Dr. Fred Hyde says about the so-called Medicare Advantage: “It’s not what you pay, it’s what you get.” That is, the corporate health plan works until they get sick, until “they want their doctor and their hospital.” Dr. Hyde was referring to the narrow networks where these companies park their beneficiaries.

More astonishing in this story of the rapacious corporate takeover of Medicare is that AARP promotes these flawed plans to their members, takes paid ads by big insurers in AARP publications, and derives income from this collaboration.

Imagine, over 50,000 SEIU retirees are automatically placed by their unions in these Medicare [Dis]advantage traps without first being allowed to choose traditional Medicare.

This whole sordid sabotage of the nineteen sixties Democrats’ dream, under President Lyndon Johnson, of taking the first step toward universal healthcare coverage for everyone, begs for more exposes. It begs for more clamor by the progressive Democrats in Congress who are strangely passive so far. I’m speaking of Representatives Jayapal, Raskin, Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), and the receding “Squad,” as well as Senators Warren and Sanders. If we can’t expect these stalwarts to start the counterattack that will save lives, save trillions of dollars over the years, focus on prevention not just treatment, and diminish the anxiety, dread, and fear, that the citizens of Canada and other western nations do not experience because they are insured from birth on, who is left to defend the American people against the arrogant health insurance corporate barons?

I’m sending this column to these self-styled progressive Democrats along with a two-page specific critique of corporate Medicare from the Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) website. PNHP’s membership counts over 15,000 pro-single-payer physicians. In a comment on the PNHP site, Don McCanne, M.D., says, “Remember, the mission of private, for-profit Medicare Advantage insurers is to make money, whereas the mission of our traditional Medicare program is to provide health care. We are supporting a program that deferentially caters to the private insurers and their interests when we should be supporting a program that is designed to take care of patients. Those being deceived by the private Medicare Advantage marketing materials really do not realize the bad deal they may be getting until they face the private insurer barriers to needed care. Silver Sneakers won’t take care of that.” (See: https://pnhp.org/news/russell-mokhiber-explains-why-private-medicare-advantage-plans-are-a-bad-deal/)

If you care about this issue, tell your Members of Congress it is time to pass Medicare for All represented by H.R. 1384.

Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate and the author of “The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future” (2012). His new book is, “Wrecking America: How Trump’s Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All” (2020, co-authored with Mark Green).

14 comments

  1. Dear Ralph Nader,

    Thank you for your clear-headed, clearly articulated description which sounds like a horrible trap.
    I’ll figure out what to do about it — spread the word? write to everyone I know?
    You are a national treasure, sir!
    With every good wish, Elspeth Macdonald

  2. So then centrist Dems, in reality center-right neolibs, continue their refusal to acknowledge the needs of the majority working class they abandoned decades ago. Along with the New Deal principles that were once the pride of the D Party and source of hope for millions.

    Also more evidence why the term “99%” is misleading. As if these Ds were in total solidarity with everyone not of the 1% plutocracy. They aren’t. We should never forget that they did for Rust Belt workers exactly what they did to the Wall St. exploiters who caused the ’08 crash–NOTHING!

    Deliberately ignoring how that impacts the physical and mental health of so many Americans through destroyed pensions and loss of coverage. It is no coincidence that the Rust Belt became opioid abuse central, as manifested by the many addicts as well as by the callous profiteering Big Pharma supplying the drugs. The same area now well known for what are called deaths of despair: alcoholism, overdoses, and suicide.

    Because lots of illness generates lots of $$$. While preventive care does little for that repulsively reified bottom line. More reasons why we need M4A/single payer where profit isn’t the entire goal.

    But the upper middle class professional and administrative elite 20% the centrist Ds actually represent aren’t directly affected. The current system works fine for them; they have comfortable incomes and good health care coverage. Add to that the D elected officials whose campaigns are so comfortably funded by insurance corporations and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

    It is no surprise that there is no real help for the 80% who are real people. While relief goes to corporations, those fictitious persons who don’t lose their jobs, don’t get sick, don’t get evicted. Who are relieved of all responsibility since their accounting systems consider devastation of communities and destruction of ecosystems to be mere “externalities.” Thus irrelevant.

  3. I was a psychiatric NP in private practice in WA state. As NP’ers we were respected by the medical community there.
    I, of course, also did my billing to insurance companies. Insurance companies take 1/3 of the healthcare dollar! So much time is spent on the phone trying to get “permission” from an insurance front line staff for the patient’s care. The big pharmaceutical companies are also “in bed” with the insurance companies resulting in endless time consuming & often, rejection of care for the patient. I am now retired but I understand, the situation is worse today.
    AARP sold out to big Pharm years ago. It’s a disgrace that we spend more on health care in this country & the result is less healthy people.

  4. Ralph,

    The solution is obvious: You should join the Peoples Party and give your endorsement to
    the 50% of voters that refuse to vote for zero choices.

    The 1% are already panicking (your endorsement will ensure their defeat ! )

    JimiG

    1. This comment is to myself and others who may not be aware that Mr. Nadar does not own a computer
      & could not respond to us, unless it was through a 3rd party, which is unlikely.

      I will send my comment to him via snail mail.

      Why did I not at least receive a response from you other commenters ?

  5. Thank you once again, Mr. Nader. The government’s abandonment of citizens in need of health care injures the heart. You’ve given hope and direction for most of my life, and I’m 84! I love you. And I love your mama’s hummus.

  6. Thank you once again, Mr. Nader. The government’s abandonment of citizens needing health care has injured the very heart of the nation. You’ve given hope and direction for most of my life–since Black Fox, since Silkwood–here in Oklahoma, and I love you for it. I also love your mama’s hummus.

  7. The Democrats show us over and over again that they have no interest in governing in the interests of the people. They’ve had nothing to offer for decades but the con of empty rhetoric and distracting/divisive identity politics. This has been clear since Clinton, at least. So we must move past the constant shock and outrage.

    Change will never come from pressuring this party. The only choice is to leave them. A serious challenge to their position must be mounted. And shame on Bernie, Warren and all of the ‘squad’ for promising – then abandoning – this most pressing goal.

  8. The Virginia Democratic Party successfully kept the Greens off the ballot last November. If we can overcome these dirty tricks and elect Greens to state and local offices, we can make a difference to peoples’ lives, such as passing local and state-based healthcare and wage reforms. The first thing we must do is stop voting Democrat and get radicalized.

  9. As someone who turns 65 in April, the insurance companies have been bombarding me with a constant barrage of junk mail advertising the “details” of their “IMPORTANT” Medicare enrollment plans. If AARP-United Healthcare, Walmart, Assurance.com (a division of Prudential Financial), Humana, TogetherHealth, BlueCross BlueShield and all the rest just sent me the money spent producing and delivering the junk, maybe I could afford to pay for the dental, eye and hearing care that my “Original” Medicare Part B medical doesn’t cover.

    If one examines the junk the insurance companies are sending, it becomes apparent that AARP-UnitedHealthcare, Walmart, Assurance.com (a division of Prudential Financial), Humana, TogetherHealth, BlueCross BlueShield and all the rest, are like Trump University on steroids. If Trump could be prosecuted for his Trump University scam, how is it that there’s no Ralph Nader-like public interest law group or Attorney General filing a public interest lawsuit against all these “IMPORTANT” Medicare scammers mailing all this fraudulent junk?

    Maybe one way to bring some sanity to the insanity that is private insurance companies selling taxpayer-funded Medicare, would be to hit AARP-UnitedHealthcare, Assurance.com (a division of Prudential Financial), Walmart, Humana, TogetherHealth, BlueCross BlueShield and all the rest with a lawsuit. Not only is it fraudulent for the insurance companies to send expensive marketing materials with pseudo-governmental messaging, designed to convey a false sense of urgency, to older adults who may have health issues, it’s also a fraud on the US taxpayer, who funds Medicare to pay for health care, not to pay for costly and deceptive marketing. Rather than funding outrageously expensive, annoying, and misleading marketing campaigns, maybe Medicare dollars should be used for health care – what a concept.

  10. Its not tbe political parties that will end the willful annihilation of the American working and middles class. It will end when elitusm and corporatism are permanently eviscerated by tge revolt of the masses.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: