Medea Benjamin Nicolas J S Davies Ukraine

We Urgently Need to Give Ukraine Peace Talks a Chance

The only realistic alternative to this endless slaughter is a return to peace talks to bring the fighting to an end.
A woman walks amid destroyed Russian tanks in Bucha, in the outskirts of Kyiv, Ukraine, in April. [Rodrigo Abd / CC BY 2.0]

By Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J.S. Davies / CODEPINK

Six months ago, Russia invaded Ukraine. The United States, NATO and the European Union (EU) wrapped themselves in the Ukrainian flag, shelled out billions for arms shipments, and imposed draconian sanctions intended to severely punish Russia for its aggression.

Since then, the people of Ukraine have been paying a price for this war that few of their supporters in the West can possibly imagine. Wars do not follow scripts, and Russia, Ukraine, the United States, NATO and the European Union have all encountered unexpected setbacks. 

Western sanctions have had mixed results, inflicting severe economic damage on Europe as well as on Russia, while the invasion and the West’s response to it have combined to trigger a food crisis across the Global South. As winter approaches, the prospect of another six months of war and sanctions threatens to plunge Europe into a serious energy crisis and poorer countries into famine. So it is in the interest of all involved to urgently reassess the possibilities of ending this protracted conflict.
For those who say negotiations are impossible, we have only to look at the talks that took place during the first month after the Russian invasion, when Russia and Ukraine tentatively agreed to a fifteen-point peace plan in talks mediated by Turkey. Details still had to be worked out, but the framework and the political will were there.  

Russia was ready to withdraw from all of Ukraine, except for Crimea and the self-declared republics in Donbas. Ukraine was ready to renounce future membership in NATO and adopt a position of neutrality between Russia and NATO. 

The agreed framework provided for political transitions in Crimea and Donbas that both sides would accept and recognize, based on self-determination for the people of those regions. The future security of Ukraine was to be guaranteed by a group of other countries, but Ukraine would not host foreign military bases on its territory.

On March 27, President Zelenskyy told a national TV audience, “Our goal is obvious—peace and the restoration of normal life in our native state as soon as possible.” He laid out his “red lines” for the negotiations on TV to reassure his people he would not concede too much, and he promised them a referendum on the neutrality agreement before it would take effect.

Such early success for a peace initiative was no surprise to conflict resolution specialists. The best chance for a negotiated peace settlement is generally during the first months of a war. Each month that a war rages on offers reduced chances for peace, as each side highlights the atrocities of the other, hostility becomes entrenched and positions harden. 

The abandonment of that early peace initiative stands as one of the great tragedies of this conflict, and the full scale of that tragedy will only become clear over time as the war rages on and its dreadful consequences accumulate.

Ukrainian and Turkish sources have revealed that the U.K. and U.S. governments played decisive roles in torpedoing those early prospects for peace. During U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s “surprise visit” to Kyiv on April 9th, he reportedly told Prime Minister Zelenskyy that the U.K. was “in it for the long run,” that it would not be party to any agreement between Russia and Ukraine, and that the “collective West” saw a chance to “press” Russia and was determined to make the most of it. 

The same message was reiterated by U.S. Defense Secretary Austin, who followed Johnson to Kyiv on April 25th and made it clear that the U.S. and NATO were no longer just trying to help Ukraine defend itself but were now committed to using the war to “weaken” Russia. Turkish diplomats told retired British diplomat Craig Murray that these messages from the United States and United Kingdom killed their otherwise promising efforts to mediate a ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution.

In response to the invasion, much of the public in Western countries accepted the moral imperative of supporting Ukraine as a victim of Russian aggression. But the decision by the U.S. and British governments to kill peace talks and prolong the war, with all the horror, pain and misery that entails for the people of Ukraine, has neither been explained to the public, nor endorsed by a consensus of NATO countries. Johnson claimed to be speaking for the “collective West,” but in May, the leaders of France, Germany and Italy all made public statements that contradicted his claim.

Addressing the European Parliament on May 9, French President Emmanuel Macron declared, “We are not at war with Russia,” and that Europe’s duty was “to stand with Ukraine to achieve the cease-fire, then build peace.”

Meeting with President Biden at the White House on May 10, Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi told reporters, “People… want to think about the possibility of bringing a cease-fire and starting again some credible negotiations. That’s the situation right now. I think that we have to think deeply about how to address this.”

After speaking by phone with President Putin on May 13, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz tweeted that he told Putin, “There must be a cease-fire in Ukraine as quickly as possible.”

But American and British officials continued to pour cold water on talk of renewed peace negotiations. The policy shift in April appears to have involved a commitment by Zelenskyy that Ukraine, like the U.K. and U.S., was “in it for the long run” and would fight on, possibly for many years, in exchange for the promise of tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons shipments, military training, satellite intelligence and Western covert operations.

As the implications of this fateful agreement became clearer, dissent began to emerge, even within the U.S. business and media establishment. On May 19, the very day that Congress appropriated $40 billion for Ukraine, including $19 billion for new weapons shipments, with not a single dissenting Democratic vote, TheNew York Times editorial board penned a lead editorial titled, “The war in Ukraine is getting complicated, and America isn’t ready.” 

The Times asked serious unanswered questions about U.S. goals in Ukraine, and tried to reel back unrealistic expectations built up by three months of one-sided Western propaganda, not least from its own pages. The board acknowledged, “A decisive military victory for Ukraine over Russia, in which Ukraine regains all the territory Russia has seized since 2014, is not a realistic goal.… Unrealistic expectations could draw [the United States and NATO] ever deeper into a costly, drawn-out war.” More recently, warhawk Henry Kissinger, of all people, publicly questioned the entire U.S. policy of reviving its Cold War with Russia and China and the absence of a clear purpose or endgame short of World War III. “We are at the edge of war with Russia and China on issues which we partly created, without any concept of how this is going to end or what it’s supposed to lead to,” Kissinger told The Wall Street Journal

U.S. leaders have inflated the danger that Russia poses to its neighbors and the West, deliberately treating it as an enemy with whom diplomacy or cooperation would be futile, rather than as a neighbor raising understandable defensive concerns over NATO expansion and its gradual encirclement by U.S. and allied military forces.  Far from aiming to deter Russia from dangerous or destabilizing actions, successive administrations of both parties have sought every means available to “overextend and unbalance” Russia, all the while misleading the American public into supporting an ever-escalating and unthinkably dangerous conflict between our two countries, which together possess more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons. 

After six months of a U.S. and NATO proxy war with Russia in Ukraine, we are at a crossroads. Further escalation should be unthinkable, but so should a long war of endless crushing artillery barrages and brutal urban and trench warfare that slowly and agonizingly destroys Ukraine, killing hundreds of Ukrainians with each day that passes. 

The only realistic alternative to this endless slaughter is a return to peace talks to bring the fighting to an end, find reasonable political solutions to Ukraine’s political divisions, and seek a peaceful framework for the underlying geopolitical competition between the United States, Russia and China. 

Campaigns to demonize, threaten and pressure our enemies can only serve to cement hostility and set the stage for war. People of good will can bridge even the most entrenched divisions and overcome existential dangers, as long as they are willing to talk – and listen – to their adversaries.

Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies are the authors ofWar in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict, which will be available from OR Books in October/November 2022.

Medea Benjamin is the cofounder of CODEPINK for Peace, and the author of several books, including Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Nicolas J. S. Davies is an independent journalist, a researcher with CODEPINK and the author of Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.

12 comments

  1. Thank you. This made sense and filled in a few holes for me.

    I think the evidence is pretty clear Biden was pushing hard for this conflict and I wouldn’t doubt that he’s threatened to cut off Zelensky if he tries to negotiate. It would be nice if our poodles would open their eyes and stop going along to damage their own economies and their own souls.

  2. Okay! Right on! Medea -please spearhead a major “Insist” March for Ukraine-Russia Peace talks. Time to stir up good trouble. Only a ruckus can bend political ears before an election. Enlist Sarandon, Leonardo di Caprio and his like minded celebrities, Jane Fonda, Oprah, and others…..this is ridiculous ….the propagandizing, the bullying and using by the USA

  3. The situation remains stuck as long as the US/NATO refuse to go back into compliance with the 1991 NATO treaty. With NATO forces now at segments of Russia’s western border, presenting an immediate threat to Russia, progress is not possible.

  4. I live on the edge of a small town north of Lake Huron. Early every morning, I walk or ride to the highway for coffee and Scheer Post automatically goes to my inbox. I read every article and want you to know I have no asset of greater value. I am grateful and proud you place courage and truth above stature and money. I don’t know why this reply was very emotional to write. Thank you.

  5. Why we don’t hear about glorious four months in preparation Kiev regime offensive in Kherson region n western media anymore?

    This is why.

    Losses of Ukraine armed forces during the counterattack on Kherson region from August 29 to September 6 (according to Russian Armed Forces General Staff)

    Ukrainian Army losses:

    3100 military personnel
    152 tanks
    151 infantry fighting vehicles
    110 combat armored vehicles
    56 armored pickups
    17 special vehicles

    Ukrainian Air Force losses:
    7 SU-25
    1 SU-24
    3 MIG-29
    3 Mi-8

    Amid Russian total Air supremacy and ten to one advantage in long range artillery (according to Ukrainian general staff) this ill conceived pseudo counteroffensive amounted by outright suicide mission.

    This is not isolated case as all this war is fought by Zelensky and his western puppet masters as suicide missions for propaganda purposes seeking victorious western headlines to solicit more futile support with not sound military strategy that could have been developed by 700,000+ strong Ukrainian army facing barely 130,000 of Russians and 40,000+ of LDPR forces.

    Zelensky is a traitor, a war criminal set to destroy his own nation.

    1. The personnel losses are a count of the dead. The numbers of incapacitated/wounded generally run three to four times the number of dead. So, the rough total for those physically put out of action (dead/wounded) here probably run about 20,000. Yet, this does not account for all of the personnel losses as there are those who go missing, those who desert, and those taken prisoner.

  6. If Medea wants to do some good first she must understand what kind of negotiations would end the western provoked tensions with Russia that after a decade of Western rejection of peace in Donbas led to Russian intervention and Ukrainian war. And with whom to negotiate.

    She would have to acknowledge that Nazi Kiev puppet regime is irrelevant and that Moscow-Kiev negotiations are futile and waste of time as Zelensky puppet master are located in Washington DC not in Kiev.

    Medea, Imagine that if not for western warmongering financing and weapons delivery there would have been cease fire months ago and perhaps reasonable peace negotiations and agreements that would include Russian reparations to Ukraine for loss of Crimea and trade/economic settlements with LDPR states to foster economic integration with Ukraine as Putin proposed years ago. It is the west that’s prevented reasonable mutuality beneficial solutions while protecting 22 millions of ethnic Russians from western Ukrainian Nazi ideologues.

    To call for negotiations she also would have acknowledged that reunification of Crimea and whole or part of Novorussia as well as Donbas is non negotiable fait accompli as control of those territories are required for vital RF national security purposes and that includes full control over Azov sea. These issues are beyond reproach of any possible peace talks.

    What also has to be negotiated are Russian demands for mutual pan-European security pact that includes Russian national security concerns as they proposed a decade ago. Negotiations demanded by Russia in December 2021 amid immediate plans for Ukraine NATO expansion as AFU has been trained and equipped by NATO for eight years and ready to be integrated into NATO military structures.

    But that would made NATO, institution specifically designed as anti Soviet bloc, obsolete. Hence such NATO hysteria, a symptom of dying irrelevant institution.

    What needs to be negotiated as well is the end to brutal unprecedented economic war waged by West against Russia. A war that west is losing badly while 400,000,000 of EU citizen paying for and suffering for EU elite psychotic delusion of crashing a nuclear power.

    This is the only path to peace in Ukraine as much as in Europe. Anything else is just a band aid, prolonging and deepening crisis perhaps into nuclear confrontation. Think about it.

  7. Madea, endless slaughter is the future. It’s now baked into the cake and nothing is going to stop it.

    Sucks I know, but there it is. Everyday that goes bye, all I get is further confirmation.

    Hold on tight because here it comes.

    1. Has your crystal ball ever delivered a mistake? Certainly, you are welcome to your opinion. And I sincerely mean that. What I find discomfiting is the number of people who are certain about a future event will fulfill their prediction while another person, Medea in this instance, is striving in today’s realities for your and my active support for an outcome contrary to and healthier than your prediction, and you tell her her efforts are worthless and by innuendo a bit stupid and hopeless. So she gets your put down on top of the magnitude of her endeavor. Your insensitivity like the proverbial wet blanket response nulls and enervates spirit. Why can’t you say something like Medea you are on a heroines journey taking on a seemingly impossible task, and I admire and stand behind you for peace and life. May your voice attract the necessary numbers of like minded citizens who are willing to go to bat for peace and you/we succeed in tipping the balance. May the force be with you.

  8. This is such utter nonsense, that I can not believe anyone would say such things, unless working for the Putin Regime itself- The bloodthirsty, callous and corrupt Putin Totalitarian State deserves no apology, or excuse.
    Totalitarian murderers with boundless greed and delusions of grandeur, must NOT be appeased.

    Showing any sympathy for all that Putin has solely created, while “blaming the victim” of his war crime is more than unjust, it is a form of political terrorism, that must be called out.

    No amount of what-about-ism, or America bashing/self-loathing can justify Putin’s War on Humanity, by using his captive state (GAS STATION WITH NUKES) for these evil ends.

    This in no way excuses the many wrongs (current or historic), committed in the name of Democracy, but please, let us not allow the perfect, to be the enemy of the good (or at least, somewhat less evil).

    1. Since you manifest so little knowledge on the subject I would like to recommend to to the work of an acknowledged expert who was considered by his peers to be the expert, and who advised US presidents – Professor Stephen Cohen. Once you actually learn something about Russia, its people, and its history, you will have a better understanding and remarks such as you made here will be of your past.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: