Assange human rights Matt Kennard Media

Rafael Correa: ‘They Have Already Destroyed Assange’

Declassified sits down with the former president of Ecuador who granted Julian Assange asylum in London. He talks about dealing with the British, how the US seeks to control his country and the lawfare campaign against him.
Then Ecuadorian foreign minister Ricardo Patiño with Julian Assange at the embassy in London, 16 June 2013. (Photo: Xavier Granja Cedeño / Ecuador foreign ministry)

By Matt Kennard / Declassified UK

  • “The British are used to being obeyed, not to negotiate with a third-world country. They tried to deal with us like a subordinate country.”
  • “Assange didn’t have any possibility of a fair legal process in the United States.”
  • “We engaged a special security company in order to protect the London embassy, to protect Julian Assange…They were captured by the CIA.”
  • “I cancelled the agreement to have an American base in our country in 2009. These are things that the American authorities do not forgive.”

On a cloudy Saturday morning in the middle of June 2012, Australian journalist Julian Assange walked into the Ecuadorian embassy in Knightsbridge, London. 

He was a hunted man. Over the past two years, he’d been revealing the secrets, in alliance with the world’s largest newspapers, of the US’s so-called War on Terror, an extraordinary explosion of violence which had been raging for more than a decade.

Britain’s Supreme Court had days before approved his extradition to Sweden to be questioned over sexual assault allegations, for which he was never charged. The case was dropped in 2019 after a review of the evidence. 

This obscure embassy in London had barely garnered a single line in the news media in its history. But over the next seven years it would become a global story involving assassination plots, industrial levels of surveillance, and finally the British police forcibly evicting Assange in April 2019.

When Assange walked into the embassy, the president of Ecuador was Rafael Correa, a US-trained economist who had assumed power five years before in 2007. He was a key figure in the “pink tide” of left-wing governments that took office across Latin America in the 2000s and would serve for a decade. 

Correa is now living in Brussels, Belgium, after himself being granted political asylum to avoid persecution by Ecuador, the state he once headed. 

In an ironic twist of fate, Correa and Assange, who has been in maximum-security Belmarsh prison for three and a half years, now share a lawyer as they both battle extradition. We are meeting at the offices of this lawyer. A giant Free Assange sign greets visitors at the entrance. 

In a dark wood panelled room looking out onto the street, Correa tells me of that June day his foreign minister told him Assange had entered the embassy in London. “We started studying his case,” Correa says.  

In August 2012 – “after two months of studying his dossier” – Correa’s government granted Assange asylum to protect him from persecution by the US government for his journalistic activities.

“There was not any possibility for him to have a fair process, that was not possible,” Correa says. “I refer to the United States, there was too much public pressure, government pressure, media pressure against him.”

British negotiations

Over the next five years, his government would enter protracted negotiations with the British authorities, who had enacted a secret campaign, codenamed Operation Pelican, to get Assange out of the embassy. Correa is withering about the UK’s attitude to these negotiations. 

“They are historically an imperial power so they believe sometimes they continue with this power,” he says of the British. “Anyway, against us that doesn’t work. And, yes, they were very rude. They wanted to impose their laws, their criteria, and we didn’t accept that.” 

He continues: “We have, as a sovereign country, the right to grant asylum to anybody without giving any explanation. But we gave an explanation because we considered the British, the American government, the Swedish government, but we didn’t have to do that.” 

Correa says British pressure escalated soon after Assange entered the embassy.

“There was a moment where the British authorities threatened us that they would enter our embassy,” Correa says. “But that was against international rights and absolutely illegal, but also silly…Why? Because they have many more embassies around the world than we do.” 

He pauses. “So if they gave to the world such a bad example, the worst consequences will be against them. Because later, without any pretext, any reason, anybody could enter, in any country, their embassies.”

Ironically, the British pressure was much more blunt than Correa was receiving from the Americans.

“Frankly, I don’t remember the American government threatening us like the British government when they said that they can enter our embassy,” Correa says. “We didn’t receive from the American government, as long as I remember, any threat like this.”

With Assange granted asylum by a friendly country like Ecuador, he should have been allowed safe passage out of the UK. 

“Of course, the British are used to being obeyed, not to negotiate with a third-world country,” Correa says. “They tried to deal with us like a subordinate country.”

‘No possibility of fair process’

Correa tells me he has only ever spoken to Assange once, when he was interviewed by him for The Julian Assange Show, a short-lived interview series mostly done before he went into the embassy.

“I don’t know Julian Assange,” Correa tells me. “I have never talked to him on the telephone or met him in person. You want my honest personal position? I don’t agree with all the things that Julian Assange did, but that is irrelevant.”

He adds: “The main point here is that he didn’t have any possibility of having a fair legal process in the United States. So absolutely we had a sovereign right to grant Julian Assange political asylum.”

But Correa is not optimistic about the end goal of the Americans and British now they have their hands on him. 

“They want to kill him,” he says. “They are destroying him. They already destroyed him. My lawyer, and we are having this interview in my lawyer’s office in Brussels, well, he’s also Julian Assange’s lawyer and he can tell you that he’s absolutely destroyed as a human being. So they already destroyed Julian Assange.” 

“They selected the weakest part of the chain: Julian Assange.”

Correa continues: “What they want to do is make an example of Julian Assange: you can see what happened with someone who dared to reveal our secrets. But what secrets did Julian Assange reveal? War crimes. We have to thank him. Instead of that they are killing him.”

Will Assange ever be free again? I ask. “I am very pessimistic. I don’t think so. They want to make an example of Assange: you cannot pass these red lines, you cannot deal with us, you cannot reveal our crimes. That is the message.”

He continues: “I realise very well, I was president for ten years, that countries must have confidential information. But there are limits. You cannot hide war crimes. And even more, you can find a double standard here. Why? Because strictly speaking, Julian Assange didn’t publish the information.

“The information was published by the New York Times, by Der Spiegel in Germany, by El Pais in Spain, the Guardian in the UK. Why are they not being punished, being persecuted? Because they are the strongest part of the chain. They selected the weakest part of the chain: Julian Assange.”

‘Captured by the CIA’

When Assange was in the Ecuadorian embassy it likely became the most surveilled premises in the world. In June, the British government admitted that Julian Assange’s long-time lawyer Jennifer Robinson was likely the subject of “covert surveillance which breached her human rights”. Ecuadorian officials inevitably received the same treatment. 

“We knew that moment there – and we continue to know – that we were under surveillance,” Correa says. “Even more, we engaged a special security company in order to protect the embassy, to protect Julian Assange, it was called UC Global from Spain. And they betrayed us. They sold the information to the CIA. They were, if you want, captured by the CIA.”

It was later revealed that it was worse than surveillance. In September 2021, Yahoo News published a story based on the testimony of 30 ex-US officials showing the CIA had sketched plans to kidnap or kill Assange in London. Correa says he read the article. Did it shock him? 

“Julian Assange was betrayed by journalists around the world, by governments around the world.”

“Of course, but it didn’t surprise me because we are used to that. This is Latin America’s history.” He adds: “One thing is very clear: for the American government Julian Assange is an enemy” and they want to “destroy his freedoms, his reputation, and perhaps his life”.

It has been striking over recent years how Latin American leaders have led the fight for Assange’s freedom, from Cristina Kirchner in Argentina to Evo Morales in Bolivia. 

Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador has even shown the infamous Collateral Murder video in his presidential press conference, offered Assange asylum and handed President Biden a letter when they met pleading for Assange’s release. 

Why is it this continent leading this press freedom case of world-historical importance?

“I don’t have an answer for that,” Correa says. “I am surprised, shocked, because Julian Assange was betrayed by journalists around the world, by governments around the world, by his own government, the Australian government.”

He adds: “If we had an Ecuadorian citizen suffering these kinds of pressures, persecution, illegal situation, our duty is to defend him, but the Australian government doesn’t care.”

Press freedom 

When Assange was granted asylum by Ecuador, much of the British press was looking for attack lines. One major one was that Correa was cracking down on press freedom in Ecuador.

The Financial Times, for example, wrote: “Assange was overlooking Correa’s worsening record when it comes to respecting freedom of the press”. 

“That is propaganda,” Correa tells me. “Can you give me an example of an attack against press freedom? But because we always looked for the truth, because we used to respond to the lies of some journalists, we are against press freedom…It’s because we are against lies, against manipulation.”

“The instrument used to maintain the status quo in Latin America is the media.”

Correa’s administration was trying to break up the oligarchal control of the media, which is particularly pronounced in Latin America. 

In fact, one example of the attack on press freedom cited by the FT was an anti-monopoly law which proposed shareholders and directors of media companies with more than 6% of national media companies should divest to other non-media interests.

“You have to be absolutely aware that the instrument used to maintain the status quo in Latin America is the media,” Correa tells me. “You have to ask this question: to whom does this media belong? To the elites in order to continue with the control of our countries. And they are going to be against any government trying to change the really hard, tough Latin American situation. For instance, we continue to be one of the most unequal regions in the world.”

Regional strategy

When Correa stepped down in 2017, the candidate nominated to fight the next election for his Alianza País party was Lenín Moreno. Moreno had been Correa’s vice president for six years, but after he won the 2017 election, he flipped. 

Correa’s relatively moderate social democratic programme saw extreme poverty in Ecuador nearly halve, inequality fall dramatically, and social spending as a percentage of GDP nearly double.

But Moreno began steadily undoing the progressive reforms of the Correa administration, reintegrating Ecuador into the Washington Consensus economic infrastructure—and getting close to the US.

A campaign of what has been termed “lawfare” was launched against officials from the Correa administration. Many had to flee the country.

Moreno’s successor as vice president, Jorge Glas, was arrested and sentenced to six years in prison on bribery charges. He was released in April this year, but was rearrested the following month. Correa himself was targeted.

“It’s a regional strategy and that can happen only if the American embassies in our countries are backing that.”

It’s a regional strategy, not just against me,” Correa says. “It’s against [former Brazilian president] Lula, against Evo Morales. Cristina Kirchner…So when you have this kind of real strategy, there is no coincidence. It’s a regional strategy and that can happen only if the American embassies in our countries are backing that.” 

Correa believes his administration’s granting of asylum to Assange is partly to blame.

“Of course part of this political persecution that I have received is because of Julian Assange. Also I cancelled the agreement to have an American base in our country in 2009. I stopped that. These are things that the American authorities do not forgive.” 

In 2009, Correa refused to renew the lease for the US military base at the coastal city of Manta in western Ecuador. “We’ll renew the base on one condition: that they let us put a base in Miami — an Ecuadorian base,” he said. The Americans didn’t agree. 

Any left-wing leader in Latin America knows that their biggest foe is the US, which has designated the Western Hemisphere as its area of influence since 1823. But during recent history, US methods of ridding the region of unwanted governments have diversified away from straight military coups like Guatemala in 1954 or Chile in 1973. 

“It’s very difficult to have, especially in South America, a military invasion from the United States, that is not possible,” Correa says. “But there are more fine, if you want, ways in order to destabilise a government that they don’t like. For instance, financing the opposition groups, for instance, NGOs, and they receive this money, the financing, from the National Endowment for Democracy that everybody knows is the financial branch of the CIA.”


But Correa says it’s not just the US that wants him and his legacy destroyed. “There is also the media hate, the elite hate…to try to conserve, to maintain the status quo. We are a danger for the status quo. We are a danger for their privileges.”

In April 2020, an Ecuadorian court sentenced Correa to eight years in prison after finding him guilty on corruption charges. Correa was accused over a $6,000 paymentto his private account, which he says was a loan.

“Eight years prison for a payment of $6,000,” he says. “One of the proofs is that I received from a common fund that we had at the presidency. They said that they were bribes. $6,000 put in my personal account in a public bank. But they have nothing. It’s just a set up against us.”

“They are not just stealing our reputation, our stability, they are stealing our democracies.”

The sentence came hours before he was going to register himself as a candidate in the 2021 presidential election. 

“In this way, they prevented me from returning to my country,” he says. “They prevented me from being a candidate and they made Lasso president.” 

Guillermo Lasso, a rightwing banker who was embroiled in the Pandora Papers offshore tax leaks, narrowly won the 2021 election. 

“They are not just stealing our reputation, our stability, they are stealing our democracies,” Correa says. “But because all these attacks are against left-wing leaders, nobody cares.”

The same thing happened in Brazil when Lula was put in prison in 2018 on corruption charges, which were eventually shown to be politically motivated. He was in prison for the elections the same year. 

“They prevented Lula from being a candidate and they made Bolsonaro, a fascist, president of Brazil,” Correa adds. 

The betrayal

Up until 2017, Moreno had been an ally and a key figure in the ‘Citizens’ Revolution’ that transformed Ecuador during Correa’s 10 years in charge. Why did he suddenly flip when he became president and try to destroy the whole movement he had been part of?

“One of the strongest hypotheses is that Lenín Moreno is corrupted,” Correa tells me. “We realise very well now. We didn’t know that moment there, but now we know that he had a secret account in Panama. We have the number, we have everything. 

“So perhaps the American government knew that before us, and they put Moreno under control. Otherwise it’s very difficult to understand what was the switch of Moreno from our political programme, progressive programme, to the far right programme and to be absolutely subordinate to the United States.” 

He continues: “One proof is that just one week after Lenín Moreno took office, he received Paul Manafort, the campaign chief of Donald Trump, and Moreno offered to Manafort to give Assange to the American government.

“You have several testimonies of people who were in this meeting in Ecuador in the presidential palace one week after Lenín Moreno took office. So that moment there, he was negotiating with Julian Assange already.”

“Nobody else will trust Latin American countries in order to look for political asylum.”

In April 2019, likely as part of this deal, Moreno rescinded Assange’s asylum and invited the British police into the Ecuadorian embassy to snatch the WikiLeaks founder. It was a watershed moment. 

“The country was humiliated,” Correa says. “Nobody else will trust Latin American countries in order to look for a political asylum. The damage is huge. It’s huge and lasting. And, even more, it is against our constitution. You can see the Article 41 of our Constitution. This article explicitly prohibits giving to the persecutors someone persecuted. So he [Moreno] broke our constitution. 

“But there is no problem as long as you are acting according to the United States government or according to the media, the elites, and against Correa, that is perhaps the most important point.”

It is clear that the pressure and stress of the extradition case and the turmoil in Ecuador has had a personal impact on Correa. He speaks quickly, rushing to express his defence against the constant attacks. He has a noticeable nervous energy, tapping his foot on the floor incessantly.

I ask Correa how he feels about it all. 

“For me it’s very hard,” he says. “It’s very sad, very disappointing, that it happened. We have to continue fighting in order to recover the country.”

Charles and Camilla

Correa says that Britain had a particularly colonial way of dealing with his country.

“We tried to have a good relationship with any country in the world but in a framework of mutual respect,” he tells me. “But it’s clear that the UK disrespects a country like Ecuador, it was not just the case of Julian Assange.”

Recently, Evo Morales told Declassified that Britain still has a “totally colonial mindset”. I ask Correa if he agrees. “Unfortunately, yes,” he replies and then gives another example.

“In 2009, the British ambassador called me and told me that Prince Charles with Camilla will come to the country to visit our Galapagos Islands. We were very honoured to have Prince Charles and Camilla. But the British ambassador not just told me, but ordered me, to receive Prince Charles on Sunday. And I told him, ‘Come on, ambassador, Sunday is my family day. I work from Monday until Saturday and try to dedicate my Sundays to my family.’”

British ambassador Linda Cross insisted on Sunday. Correa then remonstrated “but he’s coming for vacation so we can receive him on Monday, we have a very nice ceremony at the Presidential Palace every Monday, the changing of the Presidential Guard. It was a very beautiful ceremony. We can invite Prince Charles with Camilla. There are a lot of people in the central park in front of the presidential palace. He can say hello to them.” 

Ambassador Cross continued to insist it must be Sunday.

“Finally, I sent my vice president to receive Prince Charles and Camilla, and I realised very well that they didn’t forgive me because next year I had to go to London. I was invited by the London School of Economics and other universities to give some speeches. And nobody received me as president of Ecuador at the airport in London.”

This treatment is indicative of a continent that doesn’t exercise the British government, says Correa. “We are not important for the UK government.”

Matt Kennard

Matt Kennard is chief investigator at Declassified UK. He was a fellow and then director at the Centre for Investigative Journalism in London. Follow him on Twitter @kennardmatt


  1. Yes, of course the US, with the help of its reliable poodle, Britain, has already destroyed Assange. Call it murder by torture. I am a US citizen, born and raised here. I have observed US foreign policy pretty carefully for over a half century. Even if one pays only casual attention to it, it is perfectly clear that the US Empire is the most evil and destructive in the history of the world. The greatest sin, according to US doctrine, is to reveal US crimes. The US reviles truth tellers and will do everything possible to destroy them. At the present time, the independent journalists who are telling the truth about the US war of aggression in Ukraine are being harassed in every possible way, with the help of the Deep State and the social media oligarchs. The US is destroying the first amendment freedom of press and speech. There is no democracy in this Country. The electoral/political system is totally corrupt. We can no longer compete with China and other countries which use their resources to build infrastructure and support their people rather than wasting the money on the military and wars of aggression. The US answer is to wage war on those countries based on false pretexts. The US is “Exceptional” only in its ability to commit mass murder and mass destruction. The most important question now is whether there ia anyone in the US government with enough sense to avoid a nuclear war with Russia as a result of this war started by the US. I know of no such person.

    1. I am also a U.S. citizen and I recognize everything you say as true.
      I cannot express in words my disappointment in the American people.
      They have been totally and completely brainwashed,
      and that is the word, brainwashed.
      I believe something I previously never thought possible.
      I will be alive to witness at least the beginning of a nuclear war.

  2. This is how it works. It is a pyramid structure which is riddled with corruption at the top, and this corruption trickles all the way down to any corruptible individual at the very bottom. At the very pinnacle are the elites, the royal family, and their bankster cabals, these are the functionaries of the World Economic Forum and the criminals of DAVOS. Next stage down are the multi-national corporations tied in with the MICIMATT, that being an acronym for the Military Industrial Congressional Intelligence MEDIA academia think thank complex. Note that I have put MEDIA in upper case, as this is the pivot by means of which they manage the perception of the cognitively dissonant masses. The next level down from the corporate matrix, is that of central governments, the great majority of those within the Western Blob (Controlled by the City of London and Washington) Make no mistake, the UK government is totally at the service of corporate power, rather than being run by the consent of the people. It is for that reason that our ‘democracy’ is a total sham. The next stage down from centralised government are the regional authorities which appear to be serving local authorities but in reality are no more than servants of the higher power structures. This is the way the Imperial system functions and, because it is rotten at its core, is the reason why it eventually collapses in upon itself. We are witnessing the late stages of Imperial decline at this very moment. Despite the unavoidable economic an social breakdown which accompanies this general collapse, there is an upside to this, for as people are forced by circumstance to wake up once and for all to the deception that has been played out upon them for centuries, they will amass in solidarity against the elites and have the monarchy replaced with a people’s republic. And then the work can commence on removing the corrupt elements if the layers which are lower down the pyramid. As the base of the pyramid, where the true wealth creators reside, is broader, it will accommodate a much large mass of the common people whose collective power will strike fear into the hearts of the weak, effete and perverted of the ruling classes, and they will be brought down. And then we can start talking about freedom. democracy and the rights of man. God Help the King, for his days are numbered and with his imminent death will come the end of all this corruption, abuse and serfdom. And then we will all realise that there is no freedom without truth and likewise, there is no truth without freedom.

    1. In view of the utter incompetence of the leadership of the US, the EU, the UK, Germany and France, there is, unfortunately, another very real possibility in the near and medium term (meaning prior to the collapse of the corrupt system, and I do agree that the entire system is totally corrupt), which is the killing of large numbers of us with nuclear war. And the dead will probably be the lucky ones.

  3. This was edifying and such a critical set of facts from a former president in Latin America. I can’t believe this isn’t mainstreamed.
    Thank you.

  4. Very interesting read. As for the part about Assange, I have my own view of it, and the link is;

    The rule is, if you are going to fight the lords of the earth, and you do not have the will, means, and knowledge to defend against them, you will be destroyed.

    The way the forces of darkness turned Ecuador around after Correa left, is very instructive. They have their agents salted everywhere. You have to have a way of removing enemy agents when they reveal themselves.

    A representative government system will not work for the public’s interest unless there is a very powerful social movement behind it. There is a need for  models of democracy that are more actually democratic. This is a big weakness of the movement against capitalism and imperialism; no one can imagine any other governing model.

    I also wrote a short fiction story based on the Assange thing, because I am so talented. If you like fiction, you can check that out, too. But I do not want to get too focused on Assange.

    I hope Correa can get back home soon. What has happened to him is really creepy and he did not bring it on himself.

  5. This is a poem I wrote when Trump was President. Nothing has changed.

    With apologies to Martin Niemoller
    (Tho somehow I don’t think he’d mind.)

    First they came for the Native Americans
    And I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t Native American.

    Then they captured Africans, enslaving and abusing
    their bodies, minds, and souls.
    And it took the bloodiest war ever fought to bring it all down;
    After which they indentured and lynched their former slaves
    And persecuted their children and their children and…
    People went back to not stopping it.
    And those who tried to
    Marched and preached and took a knee
    And were assassinated, imprisoned,
    And stripped of their titles and their jobs.

    And when Joe McCarthy came for the Communists
    My parents didn’t speak out because they werent Communists
    Many lost their jobs
    And some were imprisoned.
    Two were executed, thanks to Trump’s mentor.

    Then Joe Arpaio came for the Latinx community
    Imprisoning, torturing and murdering them, like the long line of his anonymous predecessors,
    And Donald Trump pardoned him,
    Giving a clear “attaboy” to crimes against humanity.

    Then the militarized, Klan-infiltrated, police came — as they always had — for People of Color, murdering them with impunity,
    But now on camera so all could see…

    And they came for the immigrants of the Southern Hemisphere
    As well as those from a curated list of Muslim countries — whom THEY had driven from their homes —
    Separating parents from children.

    And they built a Wall…

    All the while displacing more refugees — and creating more people who hate America —
    Because nation-building dronestrikes and bombings
    Indiscriminately killed even those civilians
    On our side of the DMZ.

    At the same time — insanely —
    Selling military grade weapons to the highest bidder
    Until all conflicts were meaningless
    in the war on anybody’s terror
    Except their own.

    And they came again,
    After the hard won rights of LGBTQX human beings,
    Brothers and Sisters;
    And after Women’s rights
    Equally hard won.

    All the while systematically reducing and eliminating funds to help the old, poor, and disabled;
    Stripping these quiet ones of all means to care,
    Ensuring deaths of quiet desperation.

    Some of us finally started to name the enemy domestic,
    So they suppressed the vote and reinstated the poll tax and gerrymandered;
    eliminated and hid polling places.

    They made up a huge, terrifying terrorist group
    called AntiFA;
    And lumped any of us who uttered a word of protest into that ring of so-called snowflakes and libtards.

    And then they began to extraordinarily render us
    To offshore prisons and Black Ops sites
    Because they could.
    The Christofascist state reigned uber alles — at last.
    And it was too late to speak out at all.

    1. I like your use of the Niemoller frame, but I think it could be a LOT shorter and hence more effective …
      They came for the Native Americans and i was not Native American, so I said nothing
      Then they came for Black people, and I was not Black so I said nothing
      Then they came for Hispanic folk, and i was not Hispanic, so I said nothing
      Then they came for Gays, and I was not Gay, so i said nothing
      Then they came for immigrants, and I was not an immigrant, so I said nothing
      Then they came for the Poor, and I was not (yet) poor, so I said nothing
      Finally they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me …

      1. Thanks! I like your version too. Could be useful in some kind of wider distribution.

    2. Juvenile ideological rambling in verse, cheap demonization. It’s so naive and unsophisticated I’m embarrassed for you.

      1. Aha! One reading and it’s gotten under a big baby’s skin!
        Mission accomplished.

  6. I have a slightly different take – those earlier Wikileaks pieces were about war crimes and embarrassing diplomatic cables – the establishment was really “concerned” because that stuff had rather become common knowledge and re the cables, could be covered over with apologies – notice during that time no charges were formally convened – it wasn’t until the DNC communications were leaked that the knives came out … I think this whole thing was an act of revenge – so even though the charges were formally brought under Trump, they were hatched under Obama. The one who actually leaked the war crimes video, Manning, was indeed ill-used but nowhere to the extent that Assange is – the “Clinton Dems”, still, in one form or another, are the ones in control of the DP from an operational standpoint, and they are out for blood …

    “Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?” Henry II re Thomas Becket and we know what happened to Becket – carried out by those loyal to Henry. Dems, IMO, are every bit as ruthless as Rs and do not shrink from destroying leakers – if they get in the way of their political ambitions …

    I really don’t think this is about “national security”, God knows they undermine that all the time, but about revenge, pure and simple, for laundering DP dirty laundry …. and I think that the leaker of those e-mails, for that’s what they were, leaks not hacks, may well have been dispatched more simply, if not cleanly, by essentially the same folk ….

    These guys play for keeps – they want Assange dead and hope he dies in Britain …. “destroyed” is not enough, in this case – gotta be dead ….

  7. It is interesting about the Assange debate; it has the undesirable distinction of being nearly full-on Boutique Leftism where cult of personality manufacturing, symbolism, and special pleading come before clarification and

    For instance;
    1, references to “collateral murder video.” I’ve watched the video, it breaks no new ground. Some people, who should not have been, get shot to pieces. If you think that’s world-changing expose’ for which a person should be honored, you know so little about war that you should recuse yourself.
    2. “Assange is wrongly accused.” Well in fact there is a law called the espionage act that does probably cover his acts, if a prosecutor wants to go there. This is how justice via courts works generically, a prosecutor is a human not a robot.
    3. “They’re killing him!” This special pleading is too close to a cult of personalty organizing theme. The same was done with Manning. Endless men do time and live to talk about it, Mandela is an example. Incarceration waiting trial is never uplifting.

    So this whole Assange issue is as I see polluted with the weaknesses that The Left brings to every argument it makes about law & government. Everything becomes about characters, personalities, and identities where the meat of the matter is statutes, motions, money for defense. It brings to mind the people who clog busy roads, “walking to cure cancer” rather than working & donating the day’s pay.

    I’d invite readers to offer what they know to be otherwise, but people who read Assange articles are too often Occupy Protest Theater types, who think their outrage is evidence of wrong doing.

  8. Sad to see Ckent replying in such a way. There are so many MSM he parrots.
    Now that the ultimate act of gangsterism has been performed, can the USA now retire as top of the globe-all of us under its control via the neocons?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: