In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we're doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible donation.
Joshua Scheer
As tensions with Iran escalate, Pope Leo XIV used this year’s Palm Sunday mass to deliver a pointed moral rebuke—one that lands directly on the political stage. Speaking at San Pancrazio Cathedral in Albano Laziale, Italy, the Pope made clear that Jesus is not a figure to be co-opted to justify war.
Writing on X.com
“This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war,” the Pope declared, invoking scripture to condemn violence and the manipulation of faith for political ends. “He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying: ‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood’” (Is 1:15).
The sermon lands at a particularly combustible moment. As former President Donald Trump reportedly prepares a potential ground assault on Iran, analysts warn that the U.S. is hurtling toward a predictable failure—one that was expected by all but the moron, fascist stooge we currently have in the White House. “Trump’s problem is that whatever the claims he might make about the damage to Iran’s nuclear and military capacity, which is substantial, the regime survives, the international economy has been severely disrupted, and the bills keep on coming in,” says one expert tracking the escalation.
The Palm Sunday address also signals a broader cultural pushback against warmongering narratives, especially those that seek to cloak violent policy in the rhetoric of righteousness. In calling out war as fundamentally incompatible with the teachings of Jesus, Pope Leo is challenging not just the actions of a single leader but the systems that allow repeated cycles of conflict under the guise of national interest.
For observers of U.S. foreign policy, the Pope’s sermon is more than a spiritual message—it is a moral mirror reflecting the consequences of a path increasingly defined by aggression, economic disruption, and ethical compromise.
Critics say the sermon highlights a growing moral disconnect between the political class and global ethical norms. In a time when U.S. military actions abroad are under increasing scrutiny—ranging from accusations of landmine use in Iran to domestic military overreach—Pope Leo’s words serve as a stark reminder that certain religious and moral authority can hold leaders accountable when political expediency ignores human cost.
Because while Pope Leo XIV calls for peace, another, darker strain of Christianity is actively fueling the flames of war. Dozens of U.S. military commanders have reportedly framed Trump’s assault on Iran as a messianic mission, invoking apocalyptic rhetoric to justify bloodshed. According to complaints filed with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, some officers were told that Trump has been “anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth.” War Secretary Pete Hegseth, an open evangelical nationalist, has remade military leadership to reflect this extremist worldview. Critics warn that this end-times theology transforms ordinary soldiers into believers in a divine mandate for violence, turning strategic decisions into rehearsals for a biblical finale. In effect, while one arm of Christianity preaches peace, another is weaponizing faith itself to rationalize destruction—a moral schism that underscores just how far politics has distorted religion in the service of imperial ambition.
The idea that Trump is somehow bringing Armageddon with this war isn’t just fringe social‑media chatter — it’s rooted in serious reporting. Military commanders have allegedly told U.S. troops that “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth,” according to complaints logged with the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, which says more than 200 service members from across the armed forces reported similar apocalyptic rhetoric tied to the Iran war.
So which path will prevail: the message of peace, love, and harmony, or the apocalyptic end-times logic that seems to be guiding our leaders today? As I write this, the choice feels urgent. I urge readers to connect with groups actively helping people, to advocate for accountability, and to pray that the leaders driving this madness are removed from power—perhaps letting the real Armageddon be reserved for those at the very top.
Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.
You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.