In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we're doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible donation.
ScheerPost Staff
In a move that is both reckless and morally indefensible, the Trump administration unveiled a fiscal year 2027 budget proposal this past Friday that dramatically increases military spending while slashing domestic programs that keep everyday Americans afloat.
The proposal seeks a staggering $1.5 trillion in Pentagon spending—an increase of 42% over current levels—while simultaneously cutting $73 billion from nondefense discretionary spending, targeting programs ranging from education and healthcare to climate initiatives and affordable housing. According to experts, if enacted, these cuts would reduce nondefense discretionary spending to “its lowest level in the modern era.”
Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) slammed the proposal, pointing out the stark hypocrisy: “To pay for his endless wars, he wants the biggest increase to military spending in 70 years… How does he pay for it? Cuts to education, health, housing, and more. Hell no.”
Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman labeled the budget a “moral obscenity,” emphasizing that the $500 billion annual increase earmarked for the Pentagon could instead resolve many of the nation’s most pressing crises—healthcare, childcare, climate change, and affordable housing—if deployed humanely. Weissman added, “Instead, Trump and Vought propose to spend an unfathomable amount on a Pentagon that can’t even pass an audit, to further empower an out-of-control and incompetent leader in Pete Hegseth.”
The budget also proposes a “historic investment” in the Department of Homeland Security, even as ICE has faced scrutiny for deaths in detention centers and inhumane treatment of migrants. Lindsay Koshgarian of the National Priorities Project condemned the plan: “The president looked at the country, with our rising gas prices and nearly half of us struggling to afford basic necessities, and decided what we really need is a bigger war budget… Not healthcare or childcare, but a nearly bottomless budget for whatever wars his cronies and the contractors dream up next.”
Even Trump’s own rhetoric exposes the moral bankruptcy of the plan. Days before the budget release, he claimed the federal government cannot afford Medicaid, Medicare, or daycare because “we’re fighting wars,” a statement that Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) denounced as “a ridiculous farce.” Boyle added, “We are the wealthiest country in the world and can absolutely afford to both defend and invest in the American people… This budget represents ‘America Last.’”
Beyond the numbers, the budget exposes the administration’s priorities: while ordinary citizens face skyrocketing costs for food, housing, and healthcare, the government is preparing to unleash an unprecedented war fund—including a $350 billion slush fund for Trump’s ongoing conflict in Iran—all while promoting ideological and climate-related cuts under the guise of eliminating “woke programs.”
President Trump’s latest budget proposal isn’t just reckless—it’s a deliberate, moral affront to the American people. In a country where nearly half of households struggle to afford basic necessities, this administration wants to pour $1.5 trillion—yes, trillion with a T—into the Pentagon, while cutting billions from healthcare, education, housing, and climate programs. It’s a blueprint for a nation that invests in bombs, not babies; in tanks, not teachers; in war profiteers, not working families.
Under the guise of slashing “woke programs” and ending the “Green New Scam,” Trump and his handpicked budget director, Russell Vought, propose gutting vital domestic programs: the Environmental Protection Agency’s justice initiatives, renewable energy investments at the Department of the Interior, electric vehicle incentives, housing assistance, and even programs that protect public health. Meanwhile, the Pentagon—an agency that repeatedly fails audits and accountability tests—gets nearly half a trillion dollars more. If that money were spent humanely, we could make college affordable, ensure universal childcare, tackle climate change, and finally repair crumbling infrastructure. Instead, it fuels endless wars and lines the pockets of defense contractors.
The hypocrisy is staggering. Just days before unveiling this monstrosity, Trump openly admitted the government “cannot” afford Medicaid, Medicare, or daycare because “we’re fighting wars.” Let that sink in: the richest nation in history suddenly cannot care for its children, its sick, or its elderly—but somehow can afford to finance military adventurism on multiple fronts. Rep. Brendan Boyle calls it “America Last,” and he’s not wrong. This is a government putting ideology and war above people, profits above survival.
And let’s not forget the Department of Homeland Security. Even as ICE and other agencies have overseen deaths in detention centers and the inhumane treatment of migrants, Trump wants a “historic investment” to expand their reach. Lindsey Koshgarian of the National Priorities Project sums it up perfectly: ordinary Americans suffer rising costs for gas, food, and housing, while Washington prints a nearly bottomless war fund to satisfy the whims of contractors and cronies. This isn’t governance—it’s pillaging.
What makes this budget especially grotesque is the narrative it promotes. It tells Americans that helping children, protecting the climate, or funding public health is frivolous. It tells the world that the United States values military dominance over human survival. And it tells Congress that it’s acceptable to play politics with lives, funding wars of choice while letting basic services collapse.
This is not “leadership.” This is cruelty masquerading as patriotism, a moral inversion where the machinery of war is sacred, and the welfare of citizens is expendable. Congress must recognize this for what it is: an “America Last” manifesto. Reject it. Expose it. And remind the American people that we are not pawns for endless conflict, that our needs are not optional, and that a nation worth living in is one that protects its citizens before it builds its arsenal.
Trump’s budget isn’t just numbers on a page—it’s a mirror of priorities: bombs before babies, ideology before empathy, war before the common good. And that, more than anything else, is the moral obscenity we should all be outraged by.
Here Trump on funding daycare
Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things. pic.twitter.com/vLGpp7KJnm
— FactPost (@factpostnews) April 1, 2026
We don’t need military protection—it’s a lie. The very idea that this country is necessary is the point. Yes, sir, you are not needed, and the national government is not needed. If anyone in the comments can help us find a way to break this country up, the time has long passed, and it’s clear now that the American experiment is over.
Trump’s budget is not just fiscally reckless—it’s a grotesque moral middle finger to every American struggling to survive. While tens of millions go without affordable healthcare, quality schools, or safe housing, this administration wants to funnel half a trillion dollars more into a Pentagon that can’t account for a dime it already spends. Daycare? Gone. Climate programs? Slashed. Meanwhile, the machinery of war hums at full throttle, preparing billions for conflicts that the American people never asked for. It’s a blueprint for a society where profits and bombs matter more than children, families, and the planet—a Trumpian “America Last” manifesto dressed up as patriotism.
We need leaders with a sense of conscience to step up, but change also requires action from all of us. Call your representatives and let them know what you think. Organize conversations at work, in your community, and with friends—share what’s happening and encourage others to speak up. The more we engage, the more leaders are moved to act, and the stronger our collective voice becomes. Change starts when we all participate.
Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.
You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.