What the Supreme Court Ruling Against ‘Universal Injunctions’ Means for Court Challenges to Presidential Actions
The Supreme Court just made it harder for judges to block presidential policies nationwide, but lawmakers hold the key to changing that.
The Supreme Court just made it harder for judges to block presidential policies nationwide, but lawmakers hold the key to changing that.
"All persons born on U.S. soil are U.S. citizens, that is what our Constitution dictates and is something President Trump cannot undo by waving a pen," one Democratic congresswoman said.
One ACLU campaigner blasted the justices for "giving the executive branch unprecedented power to silence speech it doesn't like."
By David Greene / Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) The U.S. Supreme Court addressed government’s various roles with respect to speech on social media in five cases reviewed in its recently…
The Grants Pass v. Johnson ruling found that arresting homeless people is not a violation of our Constitutional right to protection from cruel and unusual punishment.
The bill would effectively invalidate the ruling granting presidents an extreme and unprecedented amount of power.
Platforms have First Amendment right to curate speech, as we’ve long argued, Supreme Court said, but sends laws back to lower court to decide if that applies to other functions…
By Ellen Brown / Original to ScheerPost In a highly controversial decision, the Supreme Court on June 28 reversed a 40-year old ruling, reclaiming the Court’s role as interpreter of…
The justices’ transgressions represent “one of the clearest cases” for impeachment, said Ocasio-Cortez.
By Ralph Nader / Nader.org The six “corporate state” U.S. Supreme Court Justices, occupying unaccountable lifetime unelected positions, handed over dictatorial power for presidents and corporations that disassembled our Founders’…
The Supreme Court’s Trump v. United States ruling gives Donald Trump "legal" cover for past and future lawbreaking.
Eliminating Chevron deference will harm consumers, workers, health, safety and environment, but will help corporations.
A legal journalist described the liberal justice's dissent as "one of the most terrified and terrifying pieces of judicial writing I've ever encountered."
57 percent of unhoused women report domestic violence as their immediate cause of homelessness. The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold an Oregon law could further limit their options.
"Maybe the right-wing justices could empathize with the most vulnerable Americans if they spent less time jet-setting on luxury vacations on their wealthy benefactors' dime," said one critic.