Military Nick Turse

The War on Terror Is a Success — for Terror

Terrorist groups have doubled since the passage of the 2001 AUMF. Even back in 2001, it should have been painfully predictable that this country’s war on terror would turn into a war for terror.
[The U.S. Army / CC BY 2.0]

By Nick Turse | TomDispatch

It began more than two decades ago. On September 20, 2001, President George W. Bush declared a “war on terror” and told a joint session of Congress (and the American people) that “the course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain.” If he meant a 20-year slide to defeat in Afghanistan, a proliferation of militant groups across the Greater Middle East and Africa, and a never-ending, world-spanning war that, at a minimum, has killed about 300 times the number of people murdered in America on 9/11, then give him credit. He was absolutely right.

Days earlier, Congress had authorized Bush “to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determine[d] planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 or harbored such organizations or persons.” By then, it was already evident, as Bush said in his address, that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks. But it was equally clear that he had no intention of conducting a limited campaign. “Our war on terror begins with al-Qaeda, but it does not end there,” he announced. “It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.”

Congress had already assented to whatever the president saw fit to do. It had voted 420 to 1 in the House and 98 to 0 in the Senate to grant an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that would give him (and presidents to come) essentially a free hand to make war around the world.

“I believe that it’s broad enough for the president to have the authority to do all that he needs to do to deal with this terrorist attack and threat,” Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) said at the time. “I also think that it is tight enough that the constitutional requirements and limitations are protected.” That AUMF would, however, quickly become a blank check for boundless war.

In the two decades since, that 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force has been formally invoked to justify counterterrorism (CT) operations — including ground combat, airstrikes, detention, and the support of partner militaries — in 22 countries, according to a new report by Stephanie Savell of Brown University’s Costs of War Project. During that same time, the number of terrorist groups threatening Americans and American interests has, according to the U.S. State Department, more than doubled.

Under that AUMF, U.S. troops have conducted missions across four continents. The countries in question include some of little surprise like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, and a few unexpected nations like Georgia and Kosovo. “In many cases the executive branch inadequately described the full scope of U.S. actions,” writes Savell, noting the regular invocation of vague language, pretzeled logic, and weak explanations. “In other cases, the executive branch reported on ‘support for CT operations,’ but did not acknowledge that troops were or could be involved in hostilities with militants.”

For nearly a year, the Biden administration has conducted a comprehensive evaluation of this country’s counterterrorism policies, while continuing to carry out airstrikes in at least four countries. The 2001 AUMF has, however, already been invoked by Biden to cover an unknown number of military missions in 12 countries: Afghanistan, Cuba, Djibouti, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Niger, the Philippines, Somalia, and Yemen.

“A lot is being said about the Biden administration’s rethinking of U.S. counterterrorism strategy, and while it’s true that Biden has conducted substantially less drone strikes so far than his predecessors, which is a positive step,” Savell told TomDispatch, “his invocation of the 2001 AUMF in at least 12 countries indicates that the U.S. will continue its counterterrorism activities in many places. Basically, the U.S. post-9/11 wars continue, even though U.S. troops have formally left Afghanistan.”

AUMFing in Africa

“[W]e are entering into a long twilight struggle against terrorism,” said Representative David Obey (WI), the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, on the day that the 2001 AUMF’s fraternal twin, a $40 billion emergency spending bill, was passed. “This bill is a down payment on the efforts of this country to undertake to find and punish those who committed this terrible act and those who supported them.”

If you want to buy a house, a 20% down payment has been the traditional ideal. To buy an endless war on terror in 2001, however, less than 1% was all you needed. Since that initial installment, war costs have increased to about $5.8 trillion.

“This is going to be a very nasty enterprise,” Obey continued. “This is going to be a long fight.” On both counts he was dead on. Twenty-plus years later, according to the Costs of War Project, close to one million people have been killed in direct violence during this country’s ongoing war on terror.

Over those two decades, that AUMF has also been invoked to justify detention operations at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba; efforts at a counterterrorism hub in the African nation of Djibouti to support attacks in Somalia and Yemen; and ground missions or air strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen. The authorization has also been called on to justify “support” for partner armed forces in 13 countries. The line between “support” and combat can, however, be so thin as to be functionally nonexistent.

In October 2017, after the Islamic State ambushed U.S. troops in Niger — one of the 13 AUMF “support” nations — killing four American soldiers and wounding two others, U.S. Africa Command claimed that those troops were merely providing “advice and assistance” to local counterparts. Later, it was revealed that they had been working with a Nigerien force under the umbrella of Operation Juniper Shield, a wide-ranging counterterrorism effort in northwest Africa. Until bad weather prevented it, in fact, they were slated to support another group of American commandos trying to kill or capture Islamic State leader Doundoun Cheffou as part of an effort known as Obsidian Nomad II.

Obsidian Nomad is, in fact, a 127e program — named for the budgetary authority (section 127e of title 10 of the U.S. Code) that allows Special Operations forces to use select local troops as surrogates in counterterrorism missions. Run either by Joint Special Operations Command, the secretive organization that controls the Navy’s SEAL Team 6, the Army’s Delta Force, and other elite special mission units, or by more generic “theater special operations forces,” its special operators have accompanied local commandos into the field across the African continent in operations indistinguishable from combat.

The U.S. military, for instance, ran a similar 127e counterterrorism effort, codenamed Obsidian Mosaic, in neighboring Mali. As Savell notes, no administration has ever actually cited the 2001 AUMF when it comes to Mali, but both Trump and Biden referred to providing “CT support to African and European partners” in that region. Meanwhile, Savell also notes, investigative journalists “revealed incidents in which U.S. forces engaged not just in support activities in Mali, but in active hostilities in 2015, 2017, and 2018, as well as imminent hostilities via the 127e program in 2019.” And Mali was only one of 13 African nations where U.S. troops saw combat between 2013 and 2017, according to retired Army Brigadier General Don Bolduc, who served at Africa Command and then headed Special Operations Command Africa during those years.

In 2017, the Intercept exposed the torture of prisoners at a Cameroonian military base that was used by U.S. personnel and private contractors for training missions and drone surveillance. That same year, Cameroon was cited for the first time under the 2001 AUMF as part of an effort to “support CT operations.” It was, according to Bolduc, yet another nation where U.S. troops saw combat.

American forces also fought in Kenya at around the same time, said Bolduc, even taking casualties. That country has, in fact, been cited under the AUMF during the Bush, Trump, and Biden administrations. While Biden and Trump acknowledged U.S. troop “deployments” in Kenya in the years from 2017 to 2021 to “support CT operations,” Savell notes that neither made “reference to imminent hostilities through an active 127e program beginning at least in 2017, nor to a combat incident in January 2020, when al Shabaab militants attacked a U.S. military base in Manda Bay, Kenya, and killed three Americans, one Army soldier and two Pentagon contractors.”

In addition to cataloging the ways in which that 2001 AUMF has been used, Savell’s report sheds light on glaring inconsistencies in the justifications for doing so, as well as in which nations the AUMF has been invoked and why. Few war-on-terror watchers would, for example, be shocked to see Libya on the list of countries where the authorization was used to justify air strikes or ground operations. They might, however, be surprised by the dates cited, as it was only invoked to cover military operations in 2013, and then from 2015 to 2019.

In 2011, however, during Operation Odyssey Dawn and the NATO mission that succeeded it, Operation Unified Protector (OUP), the U.S. military and eight other air forces flew sorties against the military of then-Libyan autocrat Muammar Gaddafi, leading to his death and the end of his regime. Altogether, NATO reportedly conducted around 9,700 strike sorties and dropped more than 7,700 precision-guided munitions.

Between March and October of 2011, in fact, U.S. drones flying from Italy regularly stalked the skies above Libya. “Our Predators shot 243 Hellfire missiles in the six months of OUP, over 20 percent of the total of all Hellfires expended in the 14 years of the system’s deployment,” retired Lieutenant Colonel Gary Peppers, the commander of the 324th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron during Operation Unified Protector, told the Intercept in 2018. Despite those hundreds of drone strikes, not to mention attacks by manned aircraft, the Obama administration argued, as Savell notes, that the attacks did not constitute “hostilities” and so did not require AUMF citation.

The War for Terror?

In the wake of 9/11, 90% of Americans were braying for war. Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) was one of them. “[W]e must prosecute the war that has been thrust upon us with resolve, with fortitude, with unity, until the evil terrorist groups that are waging war against our country are eradicated from the face of the Earth,” he said. More than 20 years later, al-Qaeda still exists, its affiliates have multiplied, and harsher and deadlier ideological successors have emerged on multiple continents.

As both political parties rushed the United States into a “forever war” that globalized the death and suffering al-Qaeda meted out on 9/11, only Representative Barbara Lee (D-CA) stood up to urge restraint. “Our country is in a state of mourning,” she explained. “Some of us must say, ‘Let’s step back for a moment, let’s just pause, just for a minute, and think through the implications of our actions today, so that this does not spiral out of control.’”

While the United States was defeated in Afghanistan last year, the war on terror continues to spiral elsewhere around world. Last month, in fact, President Biden informed Congress that the U.S. military “continues to work with partners around the globe, with a particular focus” on Africa and the Middle East, and “has deployed forces to conduct counterterrorism operations and to advise, assist, and accompany security forces of select foreign partners on counterterrorism operations.”

In his letter, Biden acknowledged that troops continue detention operations at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and support counterterrorism operations by the armed forces of the Philippines. He also assured Congress and the American people that the United States “remains postured to address threats” in Afghanistan; continues its ground missions and air strikes in Iraq and Syria; has forces “deployed to Yemen to conduct operations against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and ISIS”; others in Turkey “to support Counter-ISIS operations”; around 90 troops deployed to Lebanon “to enhance the government’s counterterrorism capabilities”; and has sent more than 2,100 troops to “the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to protect United States forces and interests in the region against hostile action by Iran and Iran-backed groups,” as well as approximately 3,150 personnel to Jordan “to support Counter-ISIS operations, to enhance Jordan’s security, and to promote regional stability.”

In Africa, Biden noted, U.S. forces “based outside Somalia continue to counter the terrorist threat posed by ISIS and al-Shabaab, an associated force of al Qaeda” through air strikes and assistance to Somali partners and are deployed to Kenya to support counterterrorism operations. They also remain deployed in Djibouti “for purposes of staging for counterterrorism and counter-piracy operations,” while in the Lake Chad Basin and the Sahel, U.S. troops “conduct airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations” and advise, assist, and accompany local forces on counterterrorism missions.

Just days after Biden sent that letter to Congress, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced the release of an annual counterterrorism report that also served as a useful assessment of more than 20 years of AUMF-fueled counterterror operations. Blinken pointed to the “spread of ISIS branches and networks and al-Qaeda affiliates, particularly in Africa,” while noting that “the number of terrorist attacks and the overall number of fatalities resulting from those attacks increased by more than 10 percent in 2020 compared with 2019.” The report, itself, was even bleaker. It noted that “ISIS-affiliated groups increased the volume and lethality of their attacks across West Africa, the Sahel, the Lake Chad Basin, and northern Mozambique,” while al-Qaeda “further bolstered its presence” in the Middle East and Africa. The “terrorism threat,” it added, “has become more geographically dispersed in regions around the world” while “terrorist groups remained a persistent and pervasive threat worldwide.” Worse than any qualitative assessment, however, was the quantitative report card that it offered.

The State Department had counted 32 foreign terrorist organizations scattered around the world when the 2001 AUMF was passed.. Twenty years of war, around six trillion dollars, and nearly one million corpses later, the number of terrorist groups, according to that congressionally mandated report, stands at 69.

With the passage of that AUMF, George W. Bush declared that America’s war would “not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.” Yet after 20 years, four presidents, and invocations of the AUMF in 22 countries, the number of terrorist groups that “threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security” has more than doubled.

“The 2001 AUMF is like a blank check that U.S. presidents have used to conduct military violence in an ever-expanding number of operations in any number of places, without adequate oversight from Congress. But it’s also just the tip of the iceberg,” Savell told TomDispatch. “To truly end U.S. war violence in the name of counterterrorism, repealing the 2001 AUMF is the first step, but much more needs to be done to push for government accountability on more secretive authorities and military programs.”

When Congress gave Bush that blank check — now worth $5.8 trillion and counting — he said that the outcome of the war on terror was already “certain.” Twenty years later, it’s a certainty that the president and Congress, Representative Barbara Lee aside, had it all wrong.

As 2022 begins, the Biden administration has an opportunity to end a decades-long mistake by backing efforts to replacesunset, or repeal that 2001 AUMF — or Congress could step up and do so on its own. Until then, however, that same blank check remains in effect, while the tab for the war on terror, as well as its AUMF-fueled toll in human lives, continues to rise.

Copyright 2021 Nick Turse

Nick Turse is the managing editor of TomDispatch and a fellow at the Type Media Center. He is the author most recently of Next Time They’ll Come to Count the Dead: War and Survival in South Sudan and of the bestselling Kill Anything That Moves

25 comments

  1. Congress or Senate could of asked Cheney who did 911 and saved everyone a
    lot of unnecessary war expense and more war deaths. Cheney knew what was what on the inside job. But they may of had to waterboard im.

    1. The US Congressional Industrial Military National Insecurity Saudi Israeli Complex did 9/11! We can start there and start flipping their Catalyst! 3500+ Architects & Engineers ain’t just your average conspiracy theorists!!! ae911truth.org

  2. The war on terror was successful in keeping terrorist away from America. However, it cost dearly, by progressively losing Latin America to Socialism. Moreover, for us been involved in the Middle East paying no attention to Latin America paved the way to Socialism in the region. Chávez, Maduro got a stronger hold of Venezuela and Ortega in Nicaragua became stronger indirectly thanks to our own disregard for this particular region. The Latin America region is of primary importance to the safety of our nation due to the proximity to our own nation.

    1. Marck Carbonell,
      Why are you denigrating socialism. The most contented, happiest countries in the world are socialistic. Why put down leaders who actually care about and work for the people who elected them? Our leaders certainly don’t care if Americans have security, healthcare and a good education. We’re not allowed to have good leaders. That would be a disaster for the wealthy who, with their god-awful capitalism and neoliberalism are destroying the planet. I am always amazed the greedy don’t know they are destroying themselves, too.

      1. @Rob Roy
        Marck Carbonell is probably a fascist, definitely an imperialist war-monger and police state supporter. I was going to respond to his disgusting comment but decided not to bother, because of how ridiculously right wing it is and because I have no common ground with him on which to have a discussion.

  3. New Chapter: US troops in Ukraine, closing in on the Russian border, having US network news reporting it as “Russian provocations…”

  4. Thanks, Nick Turse, for a clear and informative article. This is reporting that should be in the mainstream media. Thanks heavens for alternative realistic media.

  5. “It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.”
    The hubris of the USA is breathtaking.
    Will it ever even consider that
    1. It is the main cause of “terror” , international tension, wars and destruction in the world
    2. Making an effort to understand the points of view of others (instead of deciding they are enemies, then punishing them) would actually allow some progress towards peace
    3. Peace is actually something most people, even US American citizens, would like!!!

    1. Rosemerry has identified the crux of the issue “hubris”!

      In the immediate aftermath of 911 America had global sympathy including a million people in Tehran, Iran moved to come out in a massive display of support for those lost and the national tragedy that had befallen the US. This good will was all squandered in the blind rush by ignorant and war profiteering leaders who saw dollar signs in oil wealth they could steal and weapons sales that would line their
      pockets. The bulk of Americans wrapped themselves in the flag of a misplaced nationalism and patriotism that has seen the United States humiliated, defeated, overextended and currently insanely doing the same things over again. Highly unlikely with Biden and any other leader on the horizon this hubris will change until the American Empire is like Rome depleted completely and utterly unable to carry on even as a viable state. Sad.

    2. @rosemerry
      It doesn’t matter what people would like, it matters what they PRIORITIZE and whether their actions support war or peace. Americans not only don’t prioritize peace, they strongly support the U.S. military (regardless of whether they say that they oppose some of its actions). Furthermore, because almost all of these wars and military actions are at least in some part about oil, every drop of gasoline that people buy is a vote for war. So Americans prioritize support for the U.S. military over peace, and their daily actions support war.

  6. Yes, the war on (of) terror is a success – for terror, but whose? After all, it’s hard to keep up with all the proxy forces for US destabilization among enemy extremists like Al-Qaeda. And back in the Homeland, terrorism is an FBI monopoly enterprise, the latest extension of cointelpro, or US-Nato operation gladio. Remarkable how the strategies of tension conducted during cold war counter-insurgency campaigns have all been forgotten in the new millenium’s new world order and the project for a new American century.

    9/11 certainly was a success – for false flags. Thanks to its shock doctrine, we have been living under siege to our real enemies among the state’s departments of terror, forgetting wars waged on ‘others’ ‘over there’ are means for waging lower intensity war on us, until such time, as now, with the war on (of) bioterror, the chickens come home to roost.

    The coup is just about complete. What started twenty years ago had to hold on the anthrax agenda when the alleged Iraqui attacks were traced back to Ft. Detrick, MD. Dark Winter is now upon us with the false flag plandemic, and as people were programmed to disbelieve their own eyes with free fall collapse of the twin towers, current official narrative creates the mass delusion that an invisible enemy is stalking us while the visible enemy is hidden in plain sight.

  7. The war on terror is a success for those advocating for a police state and for the military/industrial/intelligence complex and their beneficiaries, which is mainly members of the ruling class and their minions. The morning of the Twin Towers attacks — evil places that did harm to people all over the world and to the Earth and all life here, BTW — I said that while we don’t yet know who did it or why, this will create the perfect excuse for even more of a police state.

  8. Ahh, those terrorists — Capitalists, old and new, techno, FIRE, MIC, Pharma, AI, you name them and they are the true TERRORISTS.

    Prominent Chartist activist, Ernest Jones gave the Chartist movement a more socialistic direction and he too was committed to the wider international context of the workers’ movement. In The People’s Paper of 17 February 1854, Jones wrote:

    Is there a poor and oppressed man in England? Is there a robbed and ruined artisan in France? Well, then, they appertain to one race, one country, one creed, one past, one present, and one future. The same with every nation, every colour, every section of the toiling world. Let them unite. The oppressors of humanity are united, even when they make war. They are united on one point that of keeping the peoples in misery and subjection…Each democracy, singly, may not be strong enough to break its own yoke; but together they give a moral weight, an added strength, that nothing can resist. The alliance of peoples is the more vital now, because their disunion, the rekindling of national antipathies, can alone save tottering royalty from its doom. Kings and oligarchs are playing their last card: we can prevent their game.

    In yet another article from the ‘Peoples Paper’, March 3 1855, Jones explained:

    Let none misunderstand the tenor of our meeting: we begin to-night no mere crusade against an aristocracy. We are not here to pull one tyranny down, only that another may live the stronger. We are against the tyranny of capital as well. The human race is divided between slaves and masters…Until labour commands capital, instead of capital commanding labour, I care not what political laws you make, what Republic or Monarchy you own – man is a slave.’

  9. For most of my adult life, I have felt that I do not belong on this planet. I felt that whoever implemented the laws and policies we live under, they never obtained my consent, and I refuse to consent to most of the policies and laws in existence. As an Attorney, I awakened to the fact that all rules and mores and norms were originally established by the rich few who acted solely in their own interest, and in anticipation of their future interest. Totalitarian Corporate Control by those cowards who use deception, power, and control to implement their devious plans was clear, yet my closest friends could not see this. Today the Conspiracy Theories are morphing into conspiracy fact, and everyone who would say “they would never do that” is wrong. They-WOULD. Only caring human beings would not. So you have the Great Reset. It will be a Great Regret I am happy to say.

    1. @Edward William Case
      I long felt like I wasn’t from this planet because I couldn’t relate to the vast majority of people here. Then I heard and read Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and realized that I AM from Earth, but it’s been overrun and taken over by the Golgafrinchans. It’s THEM who aren’t from this planet!

  10. Nothing can be done to reverse the course. Not when the Military Industrial Complex and the C.I.A. run our foreign policy.

  11. Which brings us back to Cheney. All those things Trump is rumored to be, Dick Cheney actually is. That’s why it’s so significant that he appeared on the floor of the House yesterday to be slobbered over by the Adam Schiffs and Nancy Pelosis of the world. Dick Cheney did more to destroy democracy in ten minutes of his Vice Presidency than Donald Trump did in four years. …

    Funny stuff from off and on again, Matt —

    https://taibbi.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-two-authoritarians?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo5MjQxODIxLCJfIjoiODA4T2EiLCJpYXQiOjE2NDE1OTA4OTUsImV4cCI6MTY0MTU5NDQ5NSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTEwNDIiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.SM-dPY8GsasW89Ar4MWn7wGwZo1EDmrzDYZ-aK54Rns

    Read my analysis/review of/rant here:

    A look into very recent history, The Case Against George W. Bush by Steven C. Markoff

    https://www.laprogressive.com/coming-home-to-roost/

    “Censorship comes in many forms. One of [them] is a colossal moral indifference to official crimes at the highest levels of our government.”

    — Ralph Nader, April 17, 2021, Ralph Nader Radio Hour

    1. @Paul+Haeder
      They don’t call Cheney “Darth Vader” for nothing! This guy is one of the most evil people on Earth. I also wish people would stop focusing on Bush II and recognize that it was Cheney who was running things. Cheney ran foreign affairs (the biggest and most important thing a president does because they have unilateral power in that area) and energy. Those two areas are the biggest chunk of what a president does that have any real effect. Bush II was more of a figurehead than anything, a partying frat boy whose family forced him to get god via Billy Graham and told him that if he wanted to receive the benefits of being a Bush, he’d have to do some work.

  12. Jeff,

    Are you riding a bike or a horse everywhere and living in a hobbit house or a cob house without solar? Or retired or living off a trust fund or an inheritance? Are you a monk out with your begging bowl or living off donations?

    I would love to be able to stop working so I don’t have to support the evil fossil fuel companies by buying their evil gas that’s destroying this beautiful planet in order to get to the stinkin’ job to work for the stinkin’ Man while federal taxes that I don’t want to pay are withheld from my check in order to support and empower this capitalistic, plutocratic, and, yes, DEMONIC! (triggered?) system that I am trapped in for my survival unless I want to end up homeless and sick or dead.

    But that’s not an option right now. Especially since the mass transit system in my city is inefficient and dismal and doesn’t run during my shift anyway and the roads are not designed to accommodate bike traffic safely, and the healthcare that I need because of my blood clotting disorder is tied to my job, and if I don’t pay property taxes the government will steal the house I “own”. So shaming me for “prioritizing” and “supporting” the military over peace when I didn’t ask to be born into this bloody awful system sounds like some holier than thou bullshit. Sounds like a Republican tactic.

    Do tell me how YOU are so privileged that you can point the finger at the rest of us. And what do you suggest I do? Practical, concrete suggestions. Not airy fairy stuff about raising my consciousness. Ohming and aahing didn’t dig my vegetable gardens and it doesn’t turn the compost.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: