criminal justice Labor Ralph Nader

Nader Calls on Attorney General Garland to Create Corporate Crimes Database

The Department of Justice must compile comprehensive data on corporate crime to measure its incidence and severity.
architecture black and white building business
Photo by Pixabay on

By Ralph Nader /

January 12, 2022

The Honorable Merrick Garland
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Robert F. Kennedy Building
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530

Re: Corporate Crime Database and Annual Report

Dear Attorney General Garland:

The U.S. Department of Justice has been clear about the dangers posed by corporate crime.

We were encouraged by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco’s speech in October 2021 outlining the Department’s plans to “strengthen the way we respond to corporate crime.”

To properly face the major threats posed by corporate crime, it is important that the Department have more specific and timely ways to measure the incidence and severity of corporate crime, to determine whether its efforts against them are successful or not, and the many ways they might be improved.

Indeed, the Deputy Attorney General recognized in her October 2021 speech that “data analytics plays a larger and larger role in corporate criminal investigations, whether that be in healthcare fraud or insider trading or market manipulation.”

But the Department of Justice still does not compile comprehensive data on corporate crime. This is a notable oversight.

It is as if the Department of Education had no measures for how well our children learn, or if the U.S. Department of Agriculture had no idea of how much wheat or corn our farmers grow.

The failure to measure can lead to sloppy thinking, bad decisions and entrenched neglect.

We urge the Department of Justice to equip itself with the power afforded by measurement and data analysis.

For street crime, the FBI oversees the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, which tracks data from over 18,000 local and state law enforcement agencies.

The Department of Justice should launch a parallel program for corporate crime and law-breaking, including but not limited to antitrust and price-fixing, environmental crimes, financial crimes, overseas bribery, health care fraud, trade violations, labor and employment-related violations (discrimination and occupational injuries and deaths), consumer fraud and damage to consumer health and safety, and corporate tax fraud onshore and offshore.

A pittance invested here will go a long way toward promoting more lawful corporate behavior and the critical public support the Department of Justice needs for adequate enforcement budgets and stronger laws.

The Department should produce and maintain a corporate crime database. This is an elemental form of accountability. Street criminals have rap sheets — corporate law-breakers ought to have them, too. This could help to deter and punish such crime in many ways.

For example, prosecutors, regulators and judges could use the database to identify recidivist violators and to assess appropriate sanctions. Procurement officials could use a corporate crime database to identify corporations that fail to meet the “responsible contractor” standard in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

In addition, by making the database available online to the public for free, it would benefit countless journalists, criminologists and other scholars, investors, and others interested in crime in the suites.

At a minimum, the corporate crime database should:

Be searchable by parent company, major subsidiaries, corporate official name, industry, type of crime, city, state, and date of crime.

Contain individual company data, including the number of civil, administrative and criminal enforcement actions brought against corporate defendants by government agencies involving a felony charge, misdemeanor, or civil charge where potential fines may be $1,000 or more.

Specify the agency bringing each charge, the charge, the name of the company charged (including the ultimate parent company), and the outcome of the action if any, including plea agreements, consent decrees, findings of innocence, convictions, and fines and other penalties.

The “Corporate Crime Database Act” (H.R. 6545 in 111th Congress, H.R. 323 in 112th Congress) was introduced in 2010 to require the Department to establish and maintain such a database, and to make it available to the public via the Internet.

Such proposals have been made by advocates for many years.

The Department should also issue an annual report on corporate crime.

At a minimum, the report should provide an estimate of the total annual cost of corporate crime in the United States.

It should include not only costs of crimes committed by individuals against businesses and investors (white-collar crime), but also the costs that corporate crime imposes on the rest of society, including the resulting deaths, injuries and property damage. 

In addition, millions of Americans lost their jobs, due to the financial crisis of 2008-9, which was caused by mortgage fraud and reckless speculative Wall Street gambling. Imagine Americans lost trillions of dollars because of financial sector greed and lawlessness.

The report should present an analysis of trends in corporate crime and an explanation of the relative effectiveness of various conventional sanctions, and the potential of new sanctions.

While the UCR Program does measure certain forms of white-collar crime, it is far from a thorough treatment of corporate crime.

The Department’s annual corporate crime report should also tally data about prosecutions and compile agency enforcement data, including budgets, descriptions, staff, and status of investigations. The report should also address the issue of unenforced noncompliance.

The report should include the number of cases referred to U.S. attorneys for prosecution each year by the FBI or other federal and state agencies, as well as the status and ultimate disposition (i.e., how many referrals were prosecuted; how many prosecuted were found guilty; how many settled with deferred and non-prosecution agreements; the magnitude and kind of penalties involved; how many cases settled).

It should also compile agency enforcement data, including the number, description, and status of investigations initiated by federal agencies (including the DOJ and Department of Labor as well as the EPA, SEC, IRS, OSHA, CPSC, FDA, FRA, FAA, NHTSA and FTC).

More than one-third of a century has elapsed since the Department issued a thorough analysis of corporate crime in America (“Illegal Corporate Behavior”, October 1979).

We are well into the 21st century, and non-governmental unofficial databases on corporate crime have been created to partially fill the void.

The University of Virginia Law School has pulled together its Corporate Prosecution Registry. The Corporate Research Project has its Violation Tracker. But there is still no comprehensive official federal database of corporate crime in America.

Given your recognition of the tremendous costs of corporate crime to Americans, their safety, household wealth and our economy, the Department must resolutely employ these most elementary tools of analysis and accountability without further delay.

We would like to discuss these matters with you, as well as enforcement budgets and broader consensus subjects relating to corporate crime, fraud and abuse that annually are costing many human casualties and hundreds of billions of dollars to taxpayers and to private-sector consumers, workers, and small businesses. 


Ralph Nader
Consumer Advocate

Rena Steinzor
Edward M. Robertson Professor of Law
University of Maryland Carey Law School

Robert Weissman
Public Citizen

Greg LeRoy
Executive Director
Good Jobs First

Philip Mattera
Corporate Research Project

Robert Fellmeth
Price Professor of Public Interest Law
University of San Diego School of Law

Charlie Cray
Senior Strategist
Greenpeace USA

John Richard
Essential Information


  1. Ralph Nader is always on the right side of any discussion. These ideas should be immediately put into practice. My worry is the number if judges who are corrupt. What does one do when a corporation is found guilty of a crime and refuses to clean up its destruction (Chevron), pay its billion dollars fine, and a whistleblower/lawyer (Steve Donzerger) gets put away as a crimnal. It begins and ends with leadership and ours is never good.

  2. Why don’t we start by eliminating “Corporate” status and hold all individuals criminally responsible-personally for any bad acts proven. Corporations have abused their status to allow corruption to become the order of the day as well as tax avoidance etc. Something drastic must be done here, not just window dressing to give an impression that something will be done.

  3. Ralph you often live in fantasy land these days. I love you man but the world has changed….

  4. White collar/corporate crime causes far more harm than street crime. The vast majority of people don’t know this, because 1) the constant media propaganda of reporting street crimes makes them seem like they’re more prevalent than they really are; 2) street crime is more direct. For example, pointing a gun at someone or shooting them is more obvious than a corporate decision to make more profit by poisoning the environment; and 3) white collar/corporate crime causes environmental harm and destruction, which street crime does not.

    Without public awareness of these issues, I see no reasonable chance of what Nader advocates happening. I fully agree with Nader that the government should compile the data showing the harms of corporate crime. In fact, the government should prosecute corporate crime far more vigorously than it does street, crime; after all, street crime is caused by poverty. But if the public has been brainwashed to think that street crime is this ubiquitous, constant, and horrible problem, and that corporate crime is no big deal, we’ll never get any of these changes. This is not to oppose Nader’s proposal or denigrate it in any way, just sayin’.

  5. Are these fools for real, and just that stupid? Or controlled opposition, keeping the rabble in line with political theater in which once again, ad nauseam, appeal is made to foxes to do a better job at guarding the henhouses? Are ‘we the people’ still going to settle for this shit even now when corporate state crimes against humanity, out to put us all on databases for death and dictatorship, reveal the true fascist nature of institutionalized partners in crime who ruthlessly rule over us in our name?

  6. Just because it won’t happen (now) doesn’t mean it can’t in the future. We must still try to hold corporations accountable, even if doesn’t happen.the very act of trying is significant. To paraphrase Eugene Debbs, it is better to advocate for something you believe in and not get it than to advocate for something you don’t want and get it. Look at what the Dems did, starting in the 70s: They got “real” and stopped living in a “fantasy land” and started drinking the Republicans’ corporate kool aid. Now they are almost indistinguishable from the damn Republicans. That sucks! It really sucks. Talk about getting what you don’t want because it’s “reasonable” and “realistic.” I’d rather be with Ralph and lose than follow Biden and win. The Dems suck. Socialism rules.

  7. Speaking of corporate crime, here is the response I got after contacting my rep. I used to think this “progressive” sellout was really going to make a difference:

    January 12, 2022

    Dear Ms. Ashton,

    Thank you for contacting Congressman Yarmuth regarding the case against Steven Donziger. We appreciate hearing from you. I am the Congressman’s Legislative Assistant for judiciary related issues, and I wanted to follow up directly to confirm receipt of your message. 

    As you are aware, attorney Steven Donziger was recently convicted of crimes related to an ongoing legal dispute with Chevron Corporation. While later legal challenges claim these verdicts were acquired through fraud and bribery,  Donziger was convicted of criminal contempt despite maintaining his innocence. Given your concern, I wanted to follow up to let you know that he was recently released on home confinement through a COVID-19 early release program.

    I hope you find this information helpful, and we hope you will continue to take time to share your views with Congressman Yarmuth moving forward in the 117th Congress. 

    Seth Drake

    Legislative Assistant

    Office of Chairman John Yarmuth (KY-03)

    402 Cannon HOB

    Washington, D.C. 20515


  8. Thank you, Mr. Nader. Keep speaking truth to power. You are an icon for justice and accountability for corporate criminals. Best Regards

  9. does nada address the police state where any dissident is targeted as a “domestic terrorist”?
    just empty slogans,,,”a liberal is a power worshipper without any power”. Orwell

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: