Corruption Economy Ralph Nader

Corporate Media Ignores Senate Hearing on Corporate Greed and Inflation

The lack of coverage over the hearing on corporate greed earlier this week reflects the influence that corporate advertisers have on mainstream media.
Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks during a Senate Budget Committee hearing June 8, 2021, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

By Ralph Nader /

It is exceedingly rare for a major congressional committee to hold hearings on “corporate greed” leading to corporate profiteering and surging prices on consumer goods. On April 5, 2022, Senate Budget Chairman, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) chartered uncensored territory on corporate avarice with a lead witness, former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, now a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

Although the hearing covered bread and butter issues, the mainstream corporate media ignored it. Massive coverage of the war in Ukraine does not offend advertisers, while the corporate war on consumers directly involves corporate advertisers.

Corporate greed takes hundreds of thousands of American lives every year (think the opioid disaster, the tobacco cancer business, the toxins in the air and water), not to mention injuries and illnesses stemming from corporations that put extra profit over concerns about public health and safety.

However, at the Senate hearing, Sanders chose to focus on the economic exploitation of consumers. Here is his introductory remark:

Across every major industry, prices continue to rise – this includes a 38 percent increase in the price of gasoline, a 44 percent increase in the price of heating oil, a 41 percent increase in the price of a used car, a 24 percent in the price of rental cars, and a 17 percent increase in the price of furniture. Further, Tyson Foods recently increased beef prices by 32 percent, the price of chicken by 20 percent and the price of pork by 13 percent. As prices increase, corporate profits hit a record high of nearly $3 trillion in 2021, up 25 percent in a single year.

He might have added that the companies profiting from these price increases paid a record low amount in federal income taxes. Moreover, the net worth of their richest shareholders soared in the midst of the pandemic.

Sanders denounced $900 billion in stock buybacks last year alone (a sign of excessive pricing power). In 2020, he added, the CEOs of major U.S. companies on average “made nearly 350 times more than the median worker.”

Senator Sanders could have noted that Apple’s CEO Tim Cook is making $50,000 an hour or about $850 a minute this year! (No, those are not typos).

Big corporations always have misleading, but plausible excuses. They are currently blaming the war in Ukraine, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the global supply chain pile-up in our ports for high prices. Well, who created the supply chain requiring U.S. consumers to buy all kinds of products from countries thousands of miles away that could have been produced here in the USA? It was Big Business CEOs who pushed corporate-managed “free trade” agreements through from Washington to Beijing. Their avaricious mantra was that their “free trade” pacts would lower prices for consumers. Really? Aside from clothing, look at the sky-high prices for your imported iPhones, your computers, cars, and drugs. The corporate boosters of the global trade pacts pocketed the excess profits from the backs of serf labor abroad.

Professor Robert Reich rebutted the corporate excuses for their higher prices by pointing out the detrimental impact on consumers of concentrated corporate power in such industries as gas and meat. With profits at a 70-year high and the companies flush with cash, why are they raising prices? His answer: “Because they can, and they can because they don’t face meaningful competition.”

Just the reverse is true. These industries dominated by a few corporations “have the power to raise prices because it makes it easy for them to informally coordinate price increases … without risking the possibility of losing customers, who have no other choice,” he testified.

“If markets were competitive,” he continued, “companies would keep their prices down to prevent competitors from grabbing away customers.” The reason they’re raising prices rather than absorbing increased costs is that they have pricing power in their locales,” as does Proctor & Gamble for diapers and toilet paper. In addition to their soaring profits, Reich showed how corporations even make money off of inflation beyond their rising costs. Tyson Foods CFO admitted this power (See the full, well-documented testimony by Professor Reich, which includes reforms –

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the malicious, duplicitous ranking Republican member of the Budget Committee, had as his witness, professor Michael Faulkender who worked for Trump’s Treasury Department. Faulkender blamed the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy (funded by banks and headed by a Trump nominee) and excessive demand fueled by Washington’s stimulus programs for price increases. This is the usual GOP routine of blaming the government for everything, even a government under the thumb of the corporate lobby. He neglected to mention that given soaring profits, companies in a competitive industry would absorb rising costs to keep their customers. Instead, these companies are passing on these costs, plus adding profit, fueling ever-higher inflation.

Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, the government’s abdication of antitrust enforcement – shaped by corporatist lobbying – allowed countless merger after merger in industry after industry to occur. But Faulkender did not dwell on this dimension of the corporate state or the relentless corporate urge to merge so they can buy their customers instead of earn them.

The Biden White House has proposed stronger antitrust and consumer protection measures. They want to tax billionaires and unproductive stock buybacks – the latter being a long-time desire of President Biden. But there is no energy by his Party in Congress compared to the energy by the GOP to stop these measures. Besides, both parties are dialing for the same corporate campaign cash – a daily begging that dilutes the reformists’ ardor.

The media blackout on Sanders’s hearing is partly the Senator’s fault. He knows how to hold a highly energetic public hearing. You have witnesses who have worked in the trenches against corporate profiteering, victims of these profiteers, and subpoenaing corporate executives like Tim Cook of Apple if they don’t testify voluntarily. There also needs to be proponents of strong corporate crime legislation.

If Democrats can’t organize a determined hearing, that generates massive media coverage, how do they expect to make these popular issues front and center in the coming November elections? How do they expect to rebut the twistificating Republicans from succeeding in blaming the Democrats for these corporate-bred inflationary pressures on voters? The Democrats haven’t even formulated the slogans for such an offensive.

The Democratic leadership has to decide what they want most – votes or more corporate campaign money to further enrich their consultants who themselves are often conflicted due to their own business clients.

Unfortunately for the American people, the knowledgeable civic community is not catching the ears of the Democratic Party candidates. Regular reports show incumbent Democrats feeling despair and defeatism over the prospect of the lying, corrupt, corporatist, and clever GOP taking control of Congress next year.

Wake up to the winning ways of addressing ALL THE PEOPLE with economic and moral policies that connect with where people live, work and raise their families. Learn from FDR!

Ralph Nader

Ralph Nader is an American political activist, author, lecturer, and attorney noted for his involvement in consumer protection, environmentalism, and government reform causes. The son of Lebanese immigrants to the United States, Nader attended Princeton University and Harvard Law School.


  1. “The Biden WH has proposed stronger anti-trust and consumer protection measures.” Speaker Pelosi says similar. But I wonder if that isn’t tossing sop to their voters. They know the Rs ( and so-called moderate Ds) will never allow any such. Thereby keeping the corporate donations flowing. If they were serious, shouldn’t their efforts be powerfully obvious?

    I just finished reading The Great American Stick-up by Robt Scheer. Nightmarish validation of what I witnessed as an unimportant union blue collar worker and old New Deal style D party local campaign manager. The party that once proudly defended the majority working class had abandoned us. We became invisible. Or worse, actively denigrated. The 20%er administrative and professional classes became the only concern of the Ivy elite, a self-styled “meritocracy”running the D party. That their interests overlap with the 1% who fund them is a given for naturally superior winners. The cliche that the cream rises to the top? Maybe, but so does the scum.

    I also finished Heartland: A Memoir of Working Hard and Being Broke in the Richest Country on Earth by Sarah Smarsh (2018.) A why and how to appeal to Red state voters. Her older relative, remembering the New Deal, insisted “the Ds are for poor people and the Rs for the rich.” The author’s mother countered “no, Ds help people, but Rs help people help themselves.”

    Smarsh says that “…financially comfortable liberals may rest assured that their fortunes result from personal merit while generously insisting they be taxed to help the ‘needy.’ Impoverished people, then, must do one of two things: concede personal failure and vote for the party more inclined to assist them, or vote for the other party, whose rhetoric conveys hope that the labor of their lives is what will compensate them.” Smug Ds need to face this truth!

    As has been the case for 50 years, Ralph is right. The D party elite must choose between votes or corporate donations. If they choose their usual trying to straddle a middle line between the two, they’ll lose. Because it will be seen as wimpy, neither/nor. A refusal to fight for the common good, what is right for the vast majority of Americans, instead of merely for their own limited interests.

  2. “The Democratic leadership has to decide what they want most – votes or more corporate campaign money to further enrich their consultants who themselves are often conflicted due to their own business clients.”

    The Democrats made this decision when Bill Clinton was president.

    As Chris hedges and Ralph Nader have so clearly recounted, both parties now compete for corporate cash: election to high office is impossible without millions — and for presidential office — at least a billion.

    You’d think investigative journalists would be stepping over each other reveal who the “buyers” and “sellers” are — but the press monopolies are only running infotainment.

  3. A sane response to high prices would be a consumer boycott. Meat too expensive? Try tofu and myriad other vegetable proteins. Gas too high? Switch to bicycles and walking, create a localized society where commuting is unnecessary. Freight too high? Switch to localized manufacture and agriculture. Heating too can be alleviated by physical improvements, simple measures as insulation and weather stripping.
    Faced with the turmoil of neoliberal social order, the people can make adjustments that will effectively end that order and create something new that can have a chance to survive the global warming catastrophe that neoliberalism has helped create.

  4. The Onion worthy headline lured me in, then Ralph being Ralph put me to sleep. A still image of water over the dam (mergers, stock buybacks) and some finger-wagging on “greed” (recall you were told as a kid don’t take too many cookies!) do not the reader’s attention, they are bits of slippery moralistic soap.

    The greed argument falls flat. The reason anyone checks their own greed is that the constant cost/benefit analyses we run in out heads all day for all things tells us OUR greed is, time after time, unrealizable wish-thinking. Ralph suggests we pine for politicians who may be feeling “despair and defeatism” over midterms. He apparently does not know most of us would love to see them told, “Worry not about the mids my elected friend, you have a rare terminal cancer.”

  5. In and indirect way, Ralph Nader is the most “pro-life” advocate living today. By pro-life, I mean advocating to save lives through product safety, anti-pollution measures, and cutting back the military-industrial scam and endless wars.
    You might owe your life to Ralph Nader.

  6. Sir, Mass murder by politicians and corporations is still murder – it is social murder yes, caused by psychopathic policies installed for the benefit corporate profit. Some some say it is collateral damage, some say it is unintentional but realists say it is social murder.
    If we do not start to fight back by setting severe limits on all corporate activity we are dead men walking. If we don’t call out predatory psychopathic corporate behavior we will all be murdered in time- when corporations feel it is necessary to kill people to get more corporate profit
    We all need to realize a corporation IS a psychopath by nature. Corporations have no feelings, no conscience, no empathy, no compassion, no guilt or remorse. They are all killers who, like Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer or Dennis Rader (BTK Bind Torture Kill) remain hidden when they should be brought under control. They are ok with polluting the world and destroying millions of lives/living areas/human welfare . Their money acquired through their non- violent violence is speech against us all and is used to further enforce their lack of humanity on Humanity. Why do we fail to see the monopoly of violence of corporations? Why do we not face the facts corporations knees should be broken to learn respect for the people
    I know we all have to die sometime but what’s the deal with allowing our social murder for profit. Sometime soon we must all realize people like us are being killed by corporate action in their millions AND they officially and legally are not criminals in any way No amount of verbal assault on their will to kill matters we are all their victims and we need to shove their corporate privilege to hurt and destroy people’s lives lifes right up their cold blooded inhuman ass**les

  7. when amerikans no longer worship money they can complain about greed, not before

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: