Gun Violence Race Thom Hartmann

Ronald Reagan’s Moment of Massive Historical Irony: How Armed Black Men Led to Gun Control

When armed Black Panthers showed up at the California State Capitol in 1967, they probably saved thousands of lives.
Two members of the Black Panther Party are met on the steps of the State Capitol in Sacramento, May 2, 1967, by Police Lt. (Getty Images/Bettmann / Contributor)

By Thom Hartman / Salon

On May 2, 1967, the destinies of Huey Newton, Bobby Seale and Ronald Reagan collided. The day saved untold thousands of lives.

At the time, California was an open-carry state with few gun restrictions. Gov. Reagan was on the steps of the State Capitol to meet and share lunch with a group of visiting eighth-graders when Newton, Seale and nearly 30 other Black Panthers pulled up out front in a small caravan of cars.

Armed with everything from pistols to 12-gauge shotguns, they climbed the half-dozen steps to the area around the front doors of the building. Seale pulled out a prepared statement, and read it to the students and people in front of the Capitol:

“Black people have begged, prayed, petitioned, demonstrated, and everything else to get the racist power structure of America to right the wrongs which have historically been perpetuated against Black people. The time has come for Black people to arm themselves against this terror before it is too late.”

They then walked into the building to confront the state’s police and legislators, fully loaded guns and rifles in their hands.

Reagan was aghast, and the nearly-all-white California legislature panicked.

“There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons,” Reagan said later that afternoon.

Within a few weeks, Republican Assemblyman Don Mulford, with bipartisan support, introduced into the California Assembly a law (AB-1591) to ban people in California from carrying loaded weapons in public.

It was enthusiastically signed into law by Reagan on July 28, fewer than three months after Seale’s proclamation at the Capitol.

Over the following years, California built on that initial gun control law. After a 1989 school shooting in Stockton, when a young white man wielding a semiautomatic weapon murdered five children and a teacher while injuring over 30 others, California passed a ban on assault weapons that stands to this day.

The state went on to ban private gun sales, closing the notorious “gun show loophole” that pours weapons into other states.  California requires all gun dealers to be registered and licensed by the state, mandates backgrounds checks and even outlawed the manufacture and sale of cheap “Saturday Night Special” handguns in the state.

When California put its own version of “red flag” laws into place — laws forbidding people flagged at risk for committing gun crimes or mass murders from purchasing guns — the state followed up (it’s one of the few in the country with an agency that studies gun violence) and found them to be nearly 100% effective because of how difficult the state makes it to obtain a weapon.

While in Texas a violent criminal on the federal no-fly terrorist watch list is welcome to buy a dozen assault weapons from the back of a car and go shoot up a school, in California you can’t buy a gun if you’ve been convicted of any violent crime whatsoever, even a misdemeanor like a bar fight.  

As a result, according to New York Times correspondent Shawn Hubler, by 2019 (the last year for which we have statistics) California’s gun deaths were around seven per 100,000 people, one of the lowest rates in the country.

“So there was a huge differential by 2019,” Hubler told Sabrina Tavernise on the Times’ podcast The Daily. “The chances of dying from gun violence in California were about 70 percent lower than they were in the rest of the country.”

California still has more gun deaths than any state in the nation except Texas, as the NRA will quickly point out, but what they won’t highlight is that California, with 40 million people (about the same as Florida and New York combined), has the largest population of any state in America. It’s bigger than 198 of the world’s 235 nations.

But compare California’s rate of seven gun deaths per 100,000 to states with virtually no gun control like Mississippi (28.6), Louisiana (26.3), Wyoming (25.9), Missouri (23.9) or Alabama (23.6) and the effectiveness of these prohibitions becomes obvious.  

If you live in Texas, floating around the national average at 14.2 gun deaths per 100,000, you’re far more likely to die from a bullet than in states with strong gun control laws like Hawaii (3.4), Massachusetts (3.7), New Jersey (5), Rhode Island (5.1), New York (5.3) or Connecticut (6).

When your gun-nut brother-in-law starts babbling about gun deaths in Chicago (Illinois, with reasonable gun control laws, is 14.1 gun deaths per 100,000 people), you may want to point out that nearly 60 percent of guns seized in Chicago came from out of state, with most coming from next-door Indiana (17.3 gun deaths per 100,000) where gun stores dot the Indiana side of the state line. 

National gun control would put a quick end to that.

In the 1932 New State Ice v. Liebmann decision, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously called the states “laboratories of democracy”:

It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.

He could have been speaking of California, Hawaii or Connecticut. Gun control works, and we have the proof right here in the United States.

While Reagan’s racism produced the first significant gun control in America’s largest state, today white supremacy is the largest force fighting against gun control.

Ironically, while it was Reagan’s racism that first produced significant gun control in America’s largest state, today white supremacy in America is the single largest force fighting against gun control.

With very few exceptions, the entire Second Amendment movement is made up of white people, many of them associated with white nationalist militias and politicians from former Confederate states.

The NRA is greatly diminished, both in power and budget, but racism continues to drive the gun control debate, this time in the opposite direction from the days Reagan was governor of California.

Today we see a knee-jerk fear of nonwhite people in the ongoing explosion of gun purchases in rural and suburban white communities across the country. When America elected our first Black president in 2008, gun stores across America were so overwhelmed by white people buying guns that it was referred to as a “frenzy” and “the great gun and ammunition shortage.”

Scratch the surface of the most fervent “gun rights” members of Congress and you’ll find unrepentant white supremacist Republican politicians who reflexively villainize the Black Lives Matter movement and hype the antifa straw man at every opportunity.

Thom Hartmann
Thom Hartmann

Thom Hartmann is a talk-show host and the author of “The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America” and more than 25 other books in print. He is a writing fellow at the Independent Media Institute.

4 comments

  1. Has been my experience as a so called “military brat.” Looking back, I see how my father’s deployments offered me a view into a diverse world I would have never had. I try to understand those who’ve never lived anywhere else but their home town, and without ever being introduced to any other culture or ways of seeing things, I see how their response is marked by their lack of ever having to deal with what seems foreign and odd. I simply don’t know how one would tell such people that there is no threat, when threat is what they’ve been sold. It’s ironic to me that my family’s military background was a window to diversity of culture and food and ideas that I love to this day. And how it has turned into something ugly and wrong.

  2. Eliminate the insane ‘liability waiver’ — which applies only to two products/industries (nuclear power plants and GUNS).

    If we were to eliminate this insane ‘waiver on product liability’ for the. Gun industry, then gun manufacturers would be open to individual ‘liability suits’ — or even better ‘class-action suits’ against gun manufacturers, like all other products, such as cars (which are similarly open to ‘liability suits’) then the broad rang of very VERY ACTIVE ‘Liability LAWYERS’ would sue the shit out of ever effin firearm maker in our America people’s entire country —- oh, in probably less time than you could say Jack Robinson!!

    But just to show that I’m a reasonable guy, people like sportsmen/women, hunters, and farmers, would still have the opportunity to have some reasonable guns they need, by simply using the ‘right-wing’ and highly honored “free market system” to go to their favorite local insurance friendly agent and freely insured their necessary gun(s) for any ‘liability coverage’, depending on how many, and what types of guns that folks thought they actually needed.

    By the honored freedom of the American ‘free market system’ every single American who wanted to buy and insure their necessary rifle, or even pistol (for self-defense) could simply tell their insurance man the number and types of guns!

    Of course if a farmer told the insurance agent that he needed a .22 to shot varmints and /or a double barreled shot gun to do his favorite duck or pheasant shooting — and the insurance agent would say, Oh John those two guns would be fully insured for only $12/year.

    But like all, double-purposed free-market products that are useful but also dangerous if used improperly, like; cars, boats, electric tools, chain-saws, all many of the products we all freely use for our business and life — the friendly insurance man would ask, “John, what sporting, hunting, or target shooting do you happen to use in the way of your guns” — and if John asserted that he had 6 AR-15s, several short barreled, extended magazine automatic shotguns, 11 Glocks, and my father’s old WWII favorite M1 carbine that I’ve modified into a fully automatic virtual M2. Then the nice insurance man would have to tell John, that his insurance would be about $2850.00 per year, and that the M2 couldn’t be insured at all because of it being legally defined as an illegal weapon of war, and that he would have to enlist in the Army (and that if he wanted to play soldier, he would have to pass a psychological test for the Army if it wanted him at all)

  3. Thom Hartmann is a truth teller. His book on the history of the Second Amendment is revealing.

    You do t hear much about the racist origins of the Second Amendment.

    We know about the Founders antipathy for a standing army. Often left out, as Hartman describes, is that the reverence for a well armed militia, un impeded by a federal government.

    This was to insure the continuation of the state militia slave patrols.

  4. But California never took guns away from cops. That’s the problem. If you take guns away from some people, you have to take them away from everyone, including cops. I’d remove all guns from the planet if I could, but making them illegal for anyone including cops would be a good start.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: