Joshua Scheer
Ed Sheeran says he has never wanted to be a political musician. He wants his concerts to be about “unity, not division” and “humanity, not politics.”
But after his tour became embroiled in controversy over the removal of rapper Macklemore, who publicly declared “Free Palestine” during Sheeran shows in New Jersey, Sheeran discovered that staying out of politics was no longer so simple.
Taking the stage at Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field on Saturday, Sheeran apologized and finally addressed the controversy directly.
“I am making mistakes, and I’m so, so sorry,” he told the crowd.
He went on to say that the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel as “horrific,” while describing what has happened in Gaza as “catastrophic and unjustifiable and disproportionate.”
“My heart has been broken by the scale of devastation and loss of civilians’ lives, children’s lives,” Sheeran said. He also condemned what he called “systemic injustice” in the occupied West Bank.
That was a significant departure from the position he had taken earlier in the controversy.
One could write volumes about a settler‑colonial state and the brutal, well‑documented abuses in the region — abuses that are overwhelmingly disproportionate because the far stronger party, Israel, wields its power without restraint. But Ed isn’t political, or so he says, which conveniently keeps him from having to know any of this.
Earlier Sheeran had previously said that the decision to remove Macklemore from the tour was made by the venues and promoter—not by him. The decision came after Macklemore publicly supported Palestine and performed a protest song accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. The performances prompted condemnation from pro-Israel advocacy groups.
The fallout was immediate. Other support acts reportedly withdrew from the remainder of Sheeran’s tour, including an Irish folk band that had been performing with him.
Sheeran insisted that his audiences do not come to his shows “to expect a political forum.”
But that argument has been difficult to sustain. Cleary musicians do not perform in a political vacuum. Their concerts take place in stadiums owned by corporations and billionaires, sponsored by companies, promoted by powerful entertainment firms and, increasingly, shaped by the political pressures surrounding who is allowed onstage and what artists are permitted to say.
And Sheeran himself has not always avoided politics.
He signed an open letter opposing Brexit and participated in a fundraising concert for humanitarian relief in Ukraine. Those actions make his sudden insistence that he is simply an apolitical musician look considerably more duplicacious or hypocritical.
And as Nate Bear lays out in his must‑read article, the music industry’s hypocrisy on this issue isn’t subtle — it’s blaring from the speakers. The Deafening Silence Of Rockstars On Palestine
The controversy exposes a truth performers hate to confront: you don’t get to choose whether politics enters the room. With Israel and Ukraine, politics doesn’t merely enter — it defines the walls, the air, the stage, leaving “apolitical” artists nowhere to hide.
Case in point: Sheeran now says he can no longer hide how he feels. “This is a humanitarian issue,” he said. “And I cannot hide how I feel about it anymore.”
Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” statements forced that question into the middle of Sheeran’s tour. The response from venues and promoters turned the controversy into something larger than a disagreement between musicians. It became a question of whose political speech is considered acceptable on a major concert stage—and whose is considered too dangerous for the business.
That admission may be the most important part of his statement.
Because whatever one thinks of Sheeran, Macklemore or the controversy surrounding their tour, the idea that artists can simply remove themselves from politics becomes harder to defend when the political consequences are already determining who gets to perform, which voices are welcomed and which are pushed off the stage.
Even Saturday Night Live seized on the contradiction.
In a weekend sketch, King Charles encountered Sheeran supposedly sitting on the fence over the war. Sheeran joked that he did not want to alienate his fans and suggested that, when it comes to conflicts, sometimes “the bravest thing you can do is say nothing at all.”
The joke works because the controversy has exposed the absurdity of that position.
No one can remain silent when injustice is at hand, and it is the height of privilege to do so. Even Pink deserves more credit on this. Maybe Ed can back up some of his own words by speaking more — and by having Macklemore as a special guest — since the venues he plays, and profits from, wouldn’t deny that request.
Silence may feel neutral to the person choosing it. But when powerful institutions are deciding which political voices are allowed on a stage, refusing to take a position does not keep politics out.
Sometimes it simply leaves the existing power structure unchallenged.
And that is precisely why the Sheeran–Macklemore controversy matters beyond pop music. It is not really about whether a concert should become a political rally. It is about what happens when an artist’s desire to remain “above politics” collides with a humanitarian catastrophe that millions of people believe demands a response — and with an entertainment industry increasingly willing to police that response.
Editor’s Note: At a moment when the once vaunted model of responsible journalism is overwhelmingly the play thing of self-serving billionaires and their corporate scribes, alternatives of integrity are desperately needed, and ScheerPost is one of them. Please support our independent journalism by contributing to our online donation platform, Network for Good, or send a check to our new PO Box. We can’t thank you enough, and promise to keep bringing you this kind of vital news.
You can also make a donation to our PayPal or subscribe to our Patreon.