Foreign Policy Forever Wars Glenn Greenwald International Military Politics

The U.S. Government Lied For Two Decades About Afghanistan

Using the same deceitful tactics they pioneered in Vietnam, U.S. political and military officials repeatedly misled the country about the prospects for success in Afghanistan
Screenshot from Al Jazeera showing Taliban leaders in Afghanistan
The Taliban give an exclusive interview to Al Jazeera after taking control of the presidential palace in Kabul, Afghanistan, Aug. 15, 2021 (Al Jazeera/YouTube)

By Glenn Greenwald / Substack

“The Taliban regime is coming to an end,” announced President George W. Bush at the National Museum of Women in the Arts on December 12, 2001 — almost twenty years ago today. Five months later, Bush vowed: “In the United States of America, the terrorists have chosen a foe unlike they have faced before. . . . We will stay until the mission is done.” Four years after that, in August of 2006, Bush announced: “Al Qaeda and the Taliban lost a coveted base in Afghanistan and they know they will never reclaim it when democracy succeeds.  . . . The days of the Taliban are over. The future of Afghanistan belongs to the people of Afghanistan.”

For two decades, the message Americans heard from their political and military leaders about the country’s longest war was the same. America is winning. The Taliban is on the verge of permanent obliteration. The U.S. is fortifying the Afghan security forces, which are close to being able to stand on their own and defend the government and the country.

Just five weeks ago, on July 8, President Biden stood in the East Room of the White House and insisted that a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was not inevitable because, while their willingness to do so might be in doubt, “the Afghan government and leadership . . . clearly have the capacity to sustain the government in place.” Biden then vehemently denied the accuracy of a reporter’s assertion that “your own intelligence community has assessed that the Afghan government will likely collapse.” Biden snapped: “That is not true.  They did not — they didn’t — did not reach that conclusion.”

Biden continued his assurances by insisting that “the likelihood there’s going to be one unified government in Afghanistan controlling the whole country is highly unlikely.” He went further: “the likelihood that there’s going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.” And then, in an exchange that will likely assume historic importance in terms of its sheer falsity from a presidential podium, Biden issued this decree:

Q.  Mr. President, some Vietnamese veterans see echoes of their experience in this withdrawal in Afghanistan.  Do you see any parallels between this withdrawal and what happened in Vietnam, with some people feeling —

THE PRESIDENT:  None whatsoever.  Zero.  What you had is — you had entire brigades breaking through the gates of our embassy — six, if I’m not mistaken. 

The Taliban is not the south — the North Vietnamese army. They’re not — they’re not remotely comparable in terms of capability.  There’s going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of an embassy in the — of the United States from Afghanistan.  It is not at all comparable. 

When asked about the Taliban being stronger than ever after twenty years of U.S. warfare there, Biden claimed: “Relative to the training and capacity of the [Afghan National Security Forces} and the training of the federal police, they’re not even close in terms of their capacity.” On July 21 — just three weeks ago — Gen. Mark Milley, Biden’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conceded that “there’s a possibility of a complete Taliban takeover, or the possibility of any number of other scenario,” yet insisted: “the Afghan Security Forces have the capacity to sufficiently fight and defend their country.”

Similar assurances have been given by the U.S. Government and military leadership to the American people since the start of the war. “Are we losing this war?,” Army Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser, commander of the 101st Airborne Division, asked rhetorically in a news briefing from Afghanistan in 2008, answering it this way: “Absolutely no way. Can the enemy win it? Absolutely no way.” On September 4, 2013, then-Lt. Gen. Milley — now Biden’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — complained that the media was not giving enough credit to the progress they had made in building up the Afghan national security forces: “This army and this police force have been very, very effective in combat against the insurgents every single day,” Gen. Milley insisted.

None of this was true. It was always a lie, designed first to justify the U.S’s endless occupation of that country and, then, once the U.S. was poised to withdraw, to concoct a pleasing fairy tale about why the prior twenty years were not, at best, an utter waste. That these claims were false cannot be reasonably disputed as the world watches the Taliban take over all of Afghanistan as if the vaunted “Afghan national security forces” were china dolls using paper weapons. But how do we know that these statements made over the course of two decades were actual lies rather than just wildly wrong claims delivered with sincerity?

To begin with, we have seen these tactics from U.S. officials — lying to the American public about wars to justify both their initiation and continuation — over and over. The Vietnam War, like the Iraq War, was begun with a complete fabrication disseminated by the intelligence community and endorsed by corporate media outlets: that the North Vietnamese had launched an unprovoked attack on U.S. ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. In 2011, President Obama, who ultimately ignored a Congressional vote against authorization of his involvement in the war in Libya to topple Muammar Qaddafi, justified the NATO war by denying that regime change was the goal: “our military mission is narrowly focused on saving lives . . . broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake.” Even as Obama issued those false assurances, The New York Times reported that “the American military has been carrying out an expansive and increasingly potent air campaign to compel the Libyan Army to turn against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.”

Just as they did for the war in Afghanistan, U.S. political and military leaders lied for years to the American public about the prospects for winning in Vietnam. On June 13, 1971, The New York Times published reports about thousands of pages of top secret documents from military planners that came to be known as “The Pentagon Papers.” Provided by former RAND official Daniel Ellsberg, who said he could not in good conscience allow official lies about the Vietnam War to continue, the documents revealed that U.S. officials in secret were far more pessimistic about the prospects for defeating the North Vietnamese than their boastful public statements suggested. In 2021, The New York Times recalled some of the lies that were demonstrated by that archive on the 50th Anniversary of its publication:

Brandishing a captured Chinese machine gun, Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara appeared at a televised news conference in the spring of 1965. The United States had just sent its first combat troops to South Vietnam, and the new push, he boasted, was further wearing down the beleaguered Vietcong.

“In the past four and one-half years, the Vietcong, the Communists, have lost 89,000 men,” he said. “You can see the heavy drain.”

That was a lie. From confidential reports, McNamara knew the situation was “bad and deteriorating” in the South. “The VC have the initiative,” the information said. “Defeatism is gaining among the rural population, somewhat in the cities, and even among the soldiers.”

Lies like McNamara’s were the rule, not the exception, throughout America’s involvement in Vietnam. The lies were repeated to the public, to Congress, in closed-door hearings, in speeches and to the press. 

The real story might have remained unknown if, in 1967, McNamara had not commissioned a secret history based on classified documents — which came to be known as the Pentagon Papers. By then, he knew that even with nearly 500,000 U.S. troops in theater, the war was at a stalemate.

The pattern of lying was virtually identical throughout several administrations when it came to Afghanistan. In 2019, The Washington Post — obviously with a nod to the Pentagon Papers — published a report about secret documents it dubbed “The Afghanistan Papers: A secret history of the war.” Under the headline “AT WAR WITH THE TRUTH,” The Post summarized its findings: “U.S. officials constantly said they were making progress. They were not, and they knew it, an exclusive Post investigation found.” They explained:

Year after year, U.S. generals have said in public they are making steady progress on the central plank of their strategy: to train a robust Afghan army and national police force that can defend the country without foreign help.

In the Lessons Learned interviews, however, U.S. military trainers described the Afghan security forces as incompetent, unmotivated and rife with deserters. They also accused Afghan commanders of pocketing salaries — paid by U.S. taxpayers — for tens of thousands of “ghost soldiers.”

None expressed confidence that the Afghan army and police could ever fend off, much less defeat, the Taliban on their own. More than 60,000 members of Afghan security forces have been killed, a casualty rate that U.S. commanders have called unsustainable.

As the Post explained, “the documents contradict a long chorus of public statements from U.S. presidents, military commanders and diplomats who assured Americans year after year that they were making progress in Afghanistan and the war was worth fighting.” Those documents dispel any doubt about whether these falsehoods were intentional:

Several of those interviewed described explicit and sustained efforts by the U.S. government to deliberately mislead the public. They said it was common at military headquarters in Kabul — and at the White House — to distort statistics to make it appear the United States was winning the war when that was not the case.

“Every data point was altered to present the best picture possible,” Bob Crowley, an Army colonel who served as a senior counterinsurgency adviser to U.S. military commanders in 2013 and 2014, told government interviewers. “Surveys, for instance, were totally unreliable but reinforced that everything we were doing was right and we became a self-licking ice cream cone.”

John Sopko, the head of the federal agency that conducted the interviews, acknowledged to The Post that the documents show “the American people have constantly been lied to.”

Last month, the independent journalist Michael Tracey, writing at Substack, interviewed a U.S. veteran of the war in Afghanistan. The former soldier, whose job was to work in training programs for the Afghan police and also participated in training briefings for the Afghan military, described in detail why the program to train Afghan security forces was such an obvious failure and even a farce. “I don’t think I could overstate that this was a system just basically designed for funneling money and wasting or losing equipment,” he said. In sum, “as far as the US military presence there — I just viewed it as a big money funneling operation”: an endless money pit for U.S. security contractors and Afghan warlords, all of whom knew that no real progress was being made, just sucking up as much U.S. taxpayer money as they could before the inevitable withdraw and takeover by the Taliban.

Last month, the independent journalist Michael Tracey, writing at Substack, interviewed a U.S. veteran of the war in Afghanistan. The former soldier, whose job was to work in training programs for the Afghan police and also participated in training briefings for the Afghan military, described in detail why the program to train Afghan security forces was such an obvious failure and even a farce. “I don’t think I could overstate that this was a system just basically designed for funneling money and wasting or losing equipment,” he said. In sum, “as far as the US military presence there — I just viewed it as a big money funneling operation”: an endless money pit for U.S. security contractors and Afghan warlords, all of whom knew that no real progress was being made, just sucking up as much U.S. taxpayer money as they could before the inevitable withdraw and takeover by the Taliban.


In light of all this, it is simply inconceivable that Biden’s false statements last month about the readiness of the Afghan military and police force were anything but intentional. That is particularly true given how heavily the U.S. had Afghanistan under every conceivable kind of electronic surveillance for more than a decade. A significant portion of the archive provided to me by Edward Snowden detailed the extensive surveillance the NSA had imposed on all of Afghanistan. In accordance with the guidelines he required, we never published most of those documents about U.S. surveillance in Afghanistan on the ground that it could endanger people without adding to the public interest, but some of the reporting gave a glimpse into just how comprehensively monitored the country was by U.S. security services.

In 2014, I reported along with Laura Poitras and another journalist that the NSA had developed the capacity, under the codenamed SOMALGET, that empowered them to be “secretly intercepting, recording, and archiving the audio of virtually every cell phone conversation” in at least five countries. At any time, they could listen to the stored conversations of any calls conducted by cell phone throughout the entire country. Though we published the names of four countries in which the program had been implemented, we withheld, after extensive internal debate at The Intercept, the identity of the fifth — Afghanistan — because the NSA had convinced some editors that publishing it would enable the Taliban to know where the program was located and it could endanger the lives of the military and private-sector employees working on it (in general, at Snowden’s request, we withheld publication of documents about NSA activities in active war zones unless they revealed illegality or other deceit). But WikiLeaks subsequently revealed, accurately, that the one country whose identity we withheld where this program was implemented was Afghanistan.

There was virtually nothing that could happen in Afghanistan without the U.S. intelligence community’s knowledge. There is simply no way that they got everything so completely wrong while innocently and sincerely trying to tell Americans the truth about what was happening there.

In sum, U.S. political and military leaders have been lying to the American public for two decades about the prospects for success in Afghanistan generally, and the strength and capacity of the Afghan security forces in particular — up through five weeks ago when Biden angrily dismissed the notion that U.S. withdrawal would result in a quick and complete Taliban takeover. Numerous documents, largely ignored by the public, proved that U.S. officials knew what they were saying was false — just as happened so many times in prior wars — and even deliberately doctored information to enable their lies.

Any residual doubt about the falsity of those two decades of optimistic claims has been obliterated by the easy and lightning-fast blitzkrieg whereby the Taliban took back control of Afghanistan as if the vaunted Afghan military did not even exist, as if it were August, 2001 all over again. It is vital not just to take note of how easily and frequently U.S. leaders lie to the public about its wars once those lies are revealed at the end of those wars, but also to remember this vital lesson the next time U.S. leaders propose a new war using the same tactics of manipulation, lies, and deceit.

9 comments

  1. I have to ask myself what is worse, what we did to those people and that country or the fact that the people of this country really don’t give a damn or will ever hold those responsible accountable. We have entered the realm of dystopia….

  2. The heroically dogged Mr. Greenwald, sitting tall with pride upon his stout, heavy-footed steed, continues to agree to live in an ‘alternate reality’, apparently thinking that by remaining grounded in that ‘fake reality’, he can best communicate with the other people who occupy (‘believe in’) that ‘reality’. (Most people in our nation are living in a delusional ‘pretend world’ in which they willfully ignore much of what they know perfectly well).

    Mr. Greenwald continually ‘proves’ to himself what he already knows. Thus he constantly proves to us all what we ALL already know.

    When is ‘the proof’ going to be done? When are we going to be convinced that what we know is really true? It really IS. We don’t have to keep proving that the sky is blue.

    Mr. Greenwald was a pre-school child in 1971, when the Pentagon Papers were ‘released’ on the nation. Those of us who witnessed this event as adults, (I was 23 in ’71), remember the genuine sense of shock that reverberated through the body politic, as well as through virtually the entire US population.

    We all know the old ‘Casablanca’ joke, as Captain Renault expresses that he is “shocked, absolutely SHOCKED” to learn that gambling was going on at Rick’s Cafe Americain.

    Mr. Greenwald continues to live in a ‘pretend world’ where people are “shocked, absolutely SHOCKED” to learn that Afghanistan was a long lucrative ‘gig’ for the well-paid ghouls for whom US foreign policy is an ongoing ‘racket’, (‘racket’ as in ‘Mafia operation’, not as in ‘a lot of noise’).

    The US population was still genuinely ‘innocent’ in ’71. Most of The People were genuinely “shocked” to learn, they were really ‘stunned’ to be confronted with irrefutable proof, that their government had lied to them.

    And not just once, as a single event, but over time. It was not ‘just a lie’. It was a Big Lie. It was a PROVEN ‘conspiracy’. A significantly large number of people agreed, in secret among themselves, to perpetrate, and then to meticulously maintain, a Big Lie.

    The Pentagon Papers proved beyond all doubt, (let alone ‘reasonable doubt’), that Public Honor had died in America. There was a palpable quick inrush of breath, as the entire nation, eyes wide in genuine shock, saw Dorothy pull the curtain aside, to reveal ‘the Great Oz’ at his wonderful and amazing Smoke and Mirrors Machine.

    Is there anyone left in America anymore that believes anything that any public official says? Other than the most yuk-gullible Pollyannas. is there anyone not fully aware that we long-ago saw the death of Public Honor in America?

    Glenn Greenwald knows things he needs to try to teach people that they do not already know. We all already know that we are ruled over by liars, crooks, and thieves. We don’t need Mr. Greenwald to keep proving this to us.

    Mr. Greenwald caught sight of ‘the forest’ for a time. He’s shown his courage. But now he’s gone back to writing about ‘the trees’.

    Everybody ‘sees’ all the trees. What people don’t ‘see’ is the forest. Yea…I know….It’s right in front of us… but seeing is not ‘seeing’. That’s the ‘whole thing’. We’d rather see the trees than ‘see’ the forest.

    The Biden Laptop cover-up continues. Nixon used some two-bit burglars from ‘the hood’ to spy on his political opponents. Obama used the effing FBI.

    When ‘they’ own the Mass Media, ‘they’ can do anything they want. When ‘they’ can bury a crucial story only days before an election, ‘they’ control the electoral process. The fact that Trump was himself a disgusting liar and charlatan does not alter the fact that the election was ‘thrown’. It was a Mass Media Coup d’Etat.

    Ukraine, under Obama ‘proconsul’ Biden, was a lucrative money pit, in which the Biden Family freely ‘wet its beak’.

    Mr. Greenwald writes:
    “The former soldier, whose job was to work in training programs for the Afghan police and also participated in training briefings for the Afghan military, described in detail why the program to train Afghan security forces was such an obvious failure and even a farce. “I don’t think I could overstate that this was a system just basically designed for funneling money and wasting or losing equipment,” he said. In sum, “as far as the US military presence there — I just viewed it as a big money funneling operation”: an endless money pit for U.S. security contractors and Afghan warlords, all of whom knew that no real progress was being made, by the Taliban.”

    Ukraine was ‘the same’ for the Obama/Biden Crew. Supervised by Skinny Joe Biden himself, Ukraine was “an endless money pit……just sucking up as much U.S. taxpayer money as they could before the inevitable withdraw and takeover……”

    Mr. Greenwald seems to think that by agreeing to be a ‘good boy’, by agreeing to inhabit a ‘fake reality’, by agreeing to pretend that we have not long-ago seen the Death of Public Honor in America, by agreeing to talk incessantly about all the trees, rather than the forest, he can maintain his ‘platform’ to use to get people to ‘see’ actual (‘real’) Reality.

    History has offered Glenn Greenwald a role to play. Well….He hasn’t flubbed it yet, but he’s not yet ‘playing’ it all that well either.

    He never ONCE ‘makes the connection’ here. It’s his OWN ‘Big Story’, but he is too busy describing trees to even mention the forest.

    1. Thank you, N Speaks! Greenwald’s opinion pieces published here have all been rehashes of the obvious. Why does Scheer Post ignore Greenwald’s pieces defending Fox and Tucker Carlson?

  3. This piece contains several mentions of Bush, Obama, and Biden, heaping blame at the feet of these three administrations (and rightly so). And yet one important name is conspicuously absent from Glengarry Glenn Greenwald’s latest screed.

    Hmmmmmmm, I wonder why that could be. Just a curious coincidence, I’m sure.

  4. We need body cameras for ALL elected officials. The move to do away with the police needs to be forgotten and jump on the wagon to put every elected member of congress out of work and take their “war chest of money” put it in the treasury and bar them from serving for at least six (6) years for a clean start. As for the president, he needs to be examined by a doctor that is not a democrat and pronounced unfit for service.

  5. Excellent review by Greenwald per usual showing that the Government has been entirely aware of everything going on in Afghanistan for the last 40 years and lied continually to the American people. The CIA destroyed Westernized secular Soviet-style Afghanistan starting in 1979 and replaced them with extremist Wahhabi fundamentalists to build an AMERICANIZED Afghanistan, where women are subjugated and Sharia is the Law. The Taliban arose in 1994, much to the chagrin of Clinton, Bush and Obama, who wanted the Saudis to remain in power. Osama bin Laden was killed in 2011; the Taliban became the new bogeyman. Any excuse for keeping the Forever War going.
    It seemed that after 49 years in DC, Biden suddenly got religion, swooping in to cancel Trump’s May withdrawal agreement with the Taliban, and replacing it with a more symbolic 9/11 date. Possibly the Taliban did not trust Biden (who is expecting a Nobel Peace Prize like Obama and Kissinger)?
    Anyway almost all Americans who don’t live near DC or NYC are delighted that this war (seemingly) is ending. Biden totally botched the withdrawal, but no surprise with his massive “experience”.

  6. A couple of trillions (2000 x 1-billion dollars) wasted……think about that, just one percent of that funding the now exploding biotechnology and nanotechnology medical research into aging could have cured aging had that amount been invested in biotechnology research and development instead of one of these forever wars that are typically wars waged at the end of empire (see anything (YouTube, books lectures by Chris hedges), for the latest in life extension research, see anything by Aubrey de Grey and look at https://www.Reddit/r/longevity and https://www.fightaging.org and the SENS and the mprize projects also googles longevity project.

  7. The time to confront the imperial lies about Afghanistan and related geopolitics was twenty years ago, beginning with the 9/11 coup and war on (of) terror. There was exposure then of the government’s duplicity, as with its own absolutely absurd conspiracy theory of who was responsible for the attacks of 9/11, setting in motion plans for war long prepared by ruling class interests. But, once again, the lies prevailed when it was most crucial to challenge and fight them, and ‘we the people’ went along for the ride.

    It seems a primary purpose of these all too familiar, ad nauseam exercises of journalism looking over some of the lies in hindsight is to congratulate career critics and their audiences of pretenses of honesty and integrity (‘we knew it all along’), and persuade people in general that we live in a free society where truth may be brought to light – after the war has been waged, when truth delayed amounts to truth denied.

    Twenty years later, and the war plans have changed. Now the chickens are coming home to roost with a vengeance, as war against humanity has been unleashed in nations across the world with the covid coup and war of bioterror. Professional class manufacturers of dissent are largely silent about and complicit with the lies of the false flag flu which has been used to march all of us into a totalitarian nightmare. And people who take pride in their knowledge of how the government has lied in the past are falling for its present lies, again.

    Those who claim eternal opposition to the fascist corporate state are mindlessly rolling up their sleeves for Frankenscience to inject them with poisonous products of the Pharmafia, in apparent forgetfulness of such past as the Nuremberg Code. Celebrated figures like Greenwald can’t seem to put 2 and 2 together except to make 5 when it comes to the deep state machinations of Big Tech which he supposedly has helped expose, once upon a time. And on and on…

    What’s the point of pointing any of this out? The rot is never-ending, apparently invincible. Only this time, when we go along for the ride, it will be on killing trains to the ultimate final solution, when the human species is no more, and any difference between lies and truth has been forever lost to completely colonized consciousness of mutant zombies genetically and digitally controlled by the “masters of mankind” (Adam Smith).

  8. The American Government, MSM and the MIC are the biggest fabricators of lies in the world. The Taliban has nothing on them…Wake up America – you’ve been duped!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: