Economy Rajan Menon Ukraine

The Economic Consequences of the War

The conflict in Ukraine is a disaster for the poor of this planet.
Economic crisis that will seriously affect Russia in 2022 due to the conflict with Ukraine. Bankruptcy and crisis concept. By Miha Creative on Shutterstock.

By Rajan Menon / TomDispatch

In 1919, the renowned British economist John Maynard Keynes wrote The Economic Consequences of the Peace, a book that would prove controversial indeed. In it, he warned that the draconian terms imposed on defeated Germany after what was then known as the Great War — which we now call World War I — would have ruinous consequences not just for that country but all of Europe. Today, I’ve adapted his title to explore the economic consequences of the (less than great) war now underway — the one in Ukraine, of course — not just for those directly involved but for the rest of the world.

Not surprisingly, following Russia’s February 24th invasion, coverage has focused mainly on the day-to-day fighting; the destruction of Ukrainian economic assets, ranging from buildings and bridges to factories and whole cities; the plight of both Ukrainian refugees and internally displaced people, or IDPs; and the mounting evidence of atrocities. The war’s potential long-term economic effects in and beyond Ukraine haven’t attracted nearly as much attention, for understandable reasons. They’re less visceral and, by definition, less immediate. Yet the war will take a huge economic toll, not just on Ukraine but on desperately poor people living thousands of miles away. Wealthier countries will experience the ill effects of the war, too, but be better able to cope with them.

Shattered Ukraine

Some expect this war to last years, even decades, though that estimate seems far too bleak. What we do know, however, is that, even two months in, Ukraine’s economic losses and the outside assistance that country will need ever to achieve anything resembling what once passed for normal are staggering.

Let’s start with Ukraine’s refugees and IDPs. Together, the two groups already make up 29% of the country’s total population. To put that in perspective, try to imagine 97 million Americans finding themselves in such a predicament in the next two months.

As of late April, 5.4 million Ukrainians had fled the country for Poland and other neighboring lands. Even though many — estimates vary between several hundred thousand and a million — have started returning, it’s unclear whether they will be able to stay (which is why the U.N.’s figures exclude them from its estimate of the total number of refugees). If the war worsens and does indeed last years, a continuing exodus of refugees could result in a total unimaginable today.

That will put even more strain on the countries hosting them, especially Poland, which has already admitted nearly three million fleeing Ukrainians. One estimate of what it costs to provide them with basic needs is $30 billion. And that’s for a single year. Moreover, when that projection was made there were a million fewer refugees than there are now. Add to that the 7.7 million Ukrainians who have left their homes but not the country itself. The cost of making all these lives whole again will be staggering.

Once the war ends and those 12.8 million uprooted Ukrainians begin to try to rebuild their lives, many will find that their apartment buildings and homes are no longer standing or not habitable. The hospitals and clinics they depended on, the places they worked, their children’s schools, the shops and malls in Kyiv and elsewhere where they bought basic necessities may have been razed or badly damaged, too. The Ukrainian economy is expected to contract by 45% this year alone, hardly surprising considering that half of its businesses aren’t operating and, according to the World Bank, its seaborne exports from its now embattled southern coast have effectively ceased. To return even to pre-war levels of production will take at least several years.

About one-third of Ukraine’s infrastructure (bridges, roads, rail lines, waterworks, and the like) has already been damaged or demolished. Repairing or rebuilding it will require between $60 billion and $119 billion. Ukraine’s Finance Minister reckons that if lost production, exports, and revenue are added in, the total damage done by the war already exceeds $500 billion. That’s nearly four times the value of Ukraine’s gross domestic product in 2020.

And mind you, such figures are approximations at best. The true costs will undoubtedly be higher and vast sums in assistance from international financial organizations and Western countries needed for years to come. At a meeting convened by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, Ukraine’s Prime Minister estimated that the rebuilding of his country would require $600 billion and that he needs $5 billion a month for the next five months just to bolster its budget. Both organizations have already swung into action. In early March, the IMF approved a $1.4 billion emergency loan for Ukraine and the World Bank an additional $723 million. And that’s sure to be just the beginning of a long-term flow of funds into Ukraine from those two lenders, while individual Western governments and the European Union will doubtless provide their own loans and grants.

The West: Higher Inflation, Lower Growth

The economic shock waves created by the war are already hurting Western economies and the pain will only increase. Economic growth in the wealthiest European countries was 5.9% in 2021. The IMF anticipates that it will fall to 3.2% in 2022 and to 2.2% in 2023. Meanwhile, between just February and March of this year, inflation in Europe surged from 5.9% to 7.9%. And that looks modest compared to the leap in European energy prices. By March they had already risen a whopping 45% compared to a year ago.

The good news, reports the Financial Times, is that unemployment has fallen to a record low of 6.8%. The bad news: inflation outran wages, so workers were actually earning 3% less.

As for the United States, economic growth, projected at 3.7% for 2022, is likely to be better than in leading European economies. However, the Conference Board, a think tank for its 2,000 member businesses, expects growth to dip to 2.2% in 2023. Meanwhile, the U.S. inflation rate reached 8.54% in late March. That’s twice what it was 12 months ago and the highest it’s been since 1981. Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, has warned that the war will create additional inflation. New York Times columnist and economist Paul Krugman believes that it will drop, but if so, the question is: When and how rapidly? Besides, Krugman expects price increases to get worse before they begin to ease. The Fed can curb inflation by jacking up interest rates, but that could end up further reducing economic growth. Indeed, Deutsche Bank made news on April 26th with its prediction that the Fed’s battle against inflation will create a “major recession” in the U.S. late next year.

Along with Europe and the U.S., the Asia-Pacific, the world’s third economic powerhouse, won’t escape unscathed either. Citing the effects of the war, the IMF cut its growth forecast for that region by another 0.5% to 4.9% this year compared to 6.5% last year. Inflation in the Asia-Pacific has been low but is expected to rise in a number of countries.

Such unwelcome trends can’t all be attributed to the war alone. The Covid-19 pandemic had created problems on many fronts and U.S. inflation was already creeping up before the invasion, but it will certainly make matters worse. Consider energy prices since February 24th, the day the war started. The price of oil was then at $89 a barrel. After zigs and zags and a March 9th peak of $119, it stabilized (at least for now) at $104.7 on April 28rd — a 17.6% jump in two months. Appeals by the U.S. and British governments to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to increase oil production went nowhere, so no one should expect quick relief.

Rates for container shipping and air cargo, already hiked by the pandemic, rose further following the invasion of Ukraine and supply-chain disruptions worsened as well. Food prices also rose, not only due to higher energy costs but also because Russia accounts for nearly 18% of global exports of wheat (and Ukraine 8%), while Ukraine’s share of global corn exports is 16% and the two countries together account for more than a quarter of global exports of wheat, a crucial crop for so many countries.

Russia and Ukraine also produce 80% of the world’s sunflower oil, widely used for cooking. Rising prices and shortages of this commodity are already apparent, not only in the European Union, but also in poorer parts of the world like the Middle East and India, which gets nearly all of its supply from Russia and Ukraine. In addition, 70% of Ukraine’s exports are carried by ships and both the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov are now war zones.

The Plight of “Low-Income” Countries

The slower growth, price hikes, and higher interest rates resulting from the efforts of central banks to tame inflation, as well as increased unemployment, will hurt people living in the West, particularly the poorest among them who spend a far larger proportion of their earnings on basic necessities like food and gas. But “low-income countries” (according to the World Bank’s definition, those with an average per-capita annual income below $1,045 in 2020), particularly their poorest denizens, will be hit so much harder. Given Ukraine’s enormous financial needs and the West’s determination to meet them, the low-income countries are likely to find it far more difficult to get the financing for the debt payments they’ll owe because of increased borrowing to cover the rising costs of imports, especially essentials like energy and food. Add to that reduced export earnings owing to slower global economic growth.

The Covid-19 pandemic had already forced low-income countries to weather the economic storm by borrowing more, but low interest rates made their debt, already at a record $860 billion, somewhat easier to manage. Now, with global growth ebbing and the costs of energy and food rising, they’ll be forced to borrow at far higher interest rates, which will only increase their repayment burden.

During the pandemic, 60% of low-income countries required relief from their debt-repayment obligations (compared to 30% in 2015). Higher interest rates, along with higher food and energy prices, will now worsen their predicament. This month, for instance, Sri Lanka defaulted on its debt. Prominent economists warn that that might prove to be a bellwether, since other countries like EgyptPakistan, and Tunisia face similar debt problems that the war is aggravating. Together, 74 low-income countries owed $35 billion in debt repayments this year, a 45% increase from 2020.

And those, mind you, are not even considered low-income countries. For them, the IMF has traditionally served as the lender of last resort, but will they be able to count on its help when Ukraine also urgently needs huge loans? The IMF and the World Bank can seek additional contributions from their wealthy member states, but will they get them, when those countries are also coping with growing economic problems and worrying about their own angry voters?

Of course, the greater the debt burden of low-income countries, the less they’ll be able to help their poorest citizens handle higher prices for essentials, especially food. The Food and Agricultural Organization’s food price index rose 12.6% just from February to March and was already 33.6% higher than a year ago.

Soaring wheat prices — at one point, the price per bushel nearly doubled before settling at a level 38% higher than last year — have already created shortages of flour and bread in Egypt, Lebanon, and Tunisia, which not long ago looked to Ukraine for between 25% and 80% of their wheat imports. Other countries, like Pakistan and Bangladesh — the former buys nearly 40% of its wheat from Ukraine, the latter 50% from Russia and Ukraine — could face the same problem.

The place suffering the most from skyrocketing food prices may be Yemen, a country that has been mired in civil war for years and faced chronic food shortages and famine well before Russia invaded Ukraine. Thirty percent of Yemen’s imported wheat comes from Ukraine and, thanks to the reduction in supply created by the war, the price per kilogram has already risen nearly five-fold in its south. The World Food Program(WFP) has been spending an extra $10 million a month for its operations there, since nearly 200,000 people could face “famine-like conditions” and 7.1 million in total will experience “emergency levels of hunger.” The problem isn’t confined to countries like Yemen, though. According to the WFP, 276 million people worldwide faced “acute hunger” even before the war began and if it drags on into the summer another 27 million to 33 million may find themselves in just that precarious position.

The Urgency of Peace — And Not Just for Ukrainians

The magnitude of the funds needed to rebuild Ukraine, the importance the U.S., Britain, the European Union, and Japan attach to that goal, and the increasing cost for critical imports are going to put the world’s poorest countries in an even tougher economic spot. To be sure, poor people in wealthy countries are also vulnerable, but those in the poorest ones will suffer so much more.

Many are already barely surviving and lack the array of social services available to the poor in wealthy nations. The American social-safety net is threadbare compared to its European analogues, but at least there is such a thing. Not so in the poorest countries. There, the least fortunate scrape by with little, if any, help from their governments. Only 20% of them are covered in any way by such programs.

The world’s poorest bear no responsibility for the war in Ukraine and have no capacity to bring it to an end. Other than the Ukrainians themselves, however, they will be hurt worst by its prolongation. The most impoverished among them are not being shelled by the Russians or occupied and subjected to war crimes like the inhabitants of the Ukrainian town of Bucha. Still, for them, too, ending the war is a matter of life or death. That much they share with the people of Ukraine.

Rajan Menon

Rajan Menon, a TomDispatch regular, is the Anne and Bernard Spitzer Professor of International Relations emeritus at the Powell School, City College of New York, director of the Grand Strategy Program at Defense Priorities, and Senior Research Scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace at Columbia University. He is the author, most recently, of The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention.

13 comments

  1. Ahh, the solution is to starve, like in Yemen, or buy dented canned crap while the elite and the AI-Military-Legal-Finance-Banking-Education-Medical-Energy-Media-Pess-Insurance-Mining-Chemical-Big Ag-Congressional Complex get to get and eat their Ukrainian Cake too. These are sociopaths, and with armies at the ready, private security, $500 an hour lawyers in their stables and off-shore and secretive accounts, we have a lot of work to do.

    Off with their heads? (are we even allowed to posit this as a question, or do we get cancelled?)

    Britain’s environment minister has drawn fire after saying shoppers can avoid rampant inflation promoted by sanctions on Russia by switching to “value brands”.

    George Eustice was condemned as “out of touch” and living in a “parallel universe” by opposition parties for his response to news that supermarket shelf prices had risen by 2.7 percent in the last 12 months.

    “Generally speaking, what people find is by going for some of the value brands rather than own-branded products – they can actually contain and manage their household budget”, Eustice said.

    Labour’s shadow chief treasury secretary, Pat McFadden, and the Liberal Democrat’s work and pensions spokeswoman, Wendy Chamberlain, laid into the Conservative minister a day before local government elections.

    “This is woefully out of touch from a government with no solution to the cost of living crisis facing working people”, McFadden said. “People are seeing their wages fall, fuel and food costs rise, and families are worried about how to make ends meet”.

    Chamberlain said the Tories were “living in a parallel universe”, adding: “Families and pensioners who can’t afford their weekly shop need more help, not patronising advice from a clueless minister”.

    1. How about cancel their heads?

      Of course we did in the 1930s; the banksters and the MIC were quite upset, you know. So they made sure their Rs/Cons stay focussed on undoing all those unpleasant New Dealisms. Then along come the “New” Dems/Libs who want to help…their own traditional voting base? Oh my no. They’re merely the smiling face of gentle (and genteel) oppression.

      Your post reminds me of a skit done by a ’80s-’90s Seattle local TV program called “Almost Live.” In which they satirized a well-known U of WA woman psych prof. who’d written a book on equal partnership marriages. Interviewer: “But doesn’t that take money?” Actor imitating Dr. Schwartz: “Well then get some!” Problem solved.

  2. The poor always suffer first and the most. But the consequences of this war will ultimately effect everyone. This will only escalate and we are lead by the greatest collection of arrogant, ignorant, incompetent, greedy assholes ever assembled by mankind. Life as you knew it is over, you just don’t know it yet.

    1. “Life as you knew it is over, you just don’t know it yet.”
      I know it and I’m spreading the word.

  3. Conveniently, the narrative managers somehow skip past the neoliberal, desupervised policies that created this s**yt storm, for ongoing 50 years (foot still on the accelerator).
    The mass starvation of the many is the objective. We’ve been taught that the end justifies the means, right?

    Now back to the regularly scheduled think tank, media distractions, censorship, silence and control.

  4. In the ultimate battle for control over the world, the use of subterfuge and manipulation over long periods of time by the US NATO, Russia itself and many other interested and disinterested countries gave rise to the mess in the Ukraine. The US Corporate Fascists endless need for money power and control fueled the fire by selling arms to the Ukraine under the guise to defend itself, but they want the war to continue indefinitely, without regard to human life and thus they are as guilty as Russia. While Russia stands to lose life the Corporations gain money and power. Therefore why is it that nobody takes out the Corporations as they are the source of all of this evil?

  5. How many millions of homeless people are in the United States? We are already experiencing a state of refugeeism. What are you doing to change it?

    And, sadly, the “outside assistance” being offered to Ukraine isn’t in any form that will help them rebuild: it’s in the form of more guns and bombs, guaranteed to keep the war rolling.

  6. And since the US and Europe could have prevented the war completely, if they got over their arogance!!!

  7. It seems that most people are pulling for Ukraine to win. The war is a zero sum game to them. The US is spending millions to arm Ukraine which in effect will lengthen the war and the pain of which Mr. Menon speaks. That money could be better spent to relieve the pain of people who are not responsible for its prosecution. High profile people like Nancy Pelosi, and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have given their blessing and everywhere you look the sentiment is the same. One must question what these people use for brains. A shorter war means less pain for the world and more resources to rebuild. What will Ukraine win if it wins and will the Russians be content to have missiles 6 minutes flying time to Moscow?

  8. All of that seems very true and somewhat terrifying to me.
    I’d only say that I think the Ukraine will not suffer as much as predicted. Thinking that they’ll probably follow a path similar to postwar Germany: full employment, a burgeoning society and economy and money and help pouring in from outside.
    I do believe there’s differences, for sure. Like Ukraine is said to be so hopelessly corrupt that perhaps money flowing in from outside won’t help any more than it does in Africa or Afghanistan. But maybe.
    And the outside world might has its own problems and might not survive them. Our greedy ruthless and stupid masters have gotten the economic or financial aspects of the world into such a state apparently that it is widely recognised it all must collapse and be replaced.
    Well if that happens Ukraine could find itself in trouble alright.
    But in that case the whole world will be in deep trouble.
    Yes. The world’s most vulnerable are going to get it in the neck again. Two years of Covid and now this.
    And why? Tell me. Why? How can you see it as being other than the insane machinations of the USA? How?

  9. “The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over either Eurasia or East Asia, but to keep the very structure of society intact.” (George Orwell)

    The war in Ukraine, with its sanctions and supply chain destruction, is part of the great war of the Great Reset. We all are collateral damage, and targets. Humanity, get off your knees.
    Economic Devastation: The Real “Long COVID”
    https://off-guardian.org/2022/05/04/economic-devastation-the-real-long-covid/

  10. What “mounting evidence of atrocities”? Oh you mean the CIA disinformation campaign where they report unverified claims or claims that are easily proven to be lies and take it as gospel, like the Mariupol hospital or the uncorroborated Bucha claims or the raping of one year old babies. The war did not cause the economic problems you mention, it is the American response of using collective punishment against all Russians in the form of sanctions, an illegal act and war crime. Poorly written and researched. Waste of my time.

    1. They little realise it but it’s punishment against all Europeans, too. Intended to prevent a consolidation between Russia and Germany or allow Europe access to an alternative petrodollar and to use Europe as a battle ground and ‘sales point’ for American arms and munitions.
      The American masters are indiscriminate in the damage they do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: