Biden Admin Glenn Greenwald Ukraine

Greenwald: Biden Wanted $33B More For Ukraine. Congress Quickly Raised it to $40B. Who Benefits?

Tens of billions, soon to be much more, are flying out of U.S. coffers to Ukraine as Americans suffer, showing who runs the U.S. Government, and for whose benefit.
US President Joe Biden speaks about the conflict in Ukraine during a visit to the Lockheed Martins Pike County Operations facility on May 3, 2022 (Photo by Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images)

By Glenn Greenwald / Substack

From the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, the Biden White House has repeatedly announced large and seemingly random amounts of money that it intends to send to fuel the war in Ukraine. The latest such dispatch, pursuant to an initial $3.5 billion fund authorized by Congress early on, was announced on Friday; “Biden says U.S. will send $1.3 billion in additional military and economic support to Ukraine,” read the CNBC headline. This was preceded by a series of new lavish spending packages for the war, unveiled every two to three weeks, starting on the third day of the war:

  • Feb. 26: “Biden approves $350 million in military aid for Ukraine”: Reuters
  • Mar. 16: “Biden announces $800 million in military aid for Ukraine”: The New York Times
  • Mar. 30: “Ukraine to receive additional $500 million in aid from U.S., Biden announces”: NBC News
  • Apr. 12: “U.S. to announce $750 million more in weapons for Ukraine, officials say”:  Reuters;
  • May 6: “Biden announces new $150 million weapons package for Ukraine”: Reuters.

Those amounts by themselves are in excess of $3 billion; by the end of April, the total U.S. expenditure on the war in Ukraine was close to $14 billion, drawn from the additional $13.5 billion Congress authorized in mid-March. While some of that is earmarked for economic and humanitarian assistance for Ukraine, most of it will go into the coffers of the weapons industry — including Raytheon, on whose Board of Directors the current Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, sat immediately before being chosen by Biden to run the Pentagon. As CNN put it: “about $6.5 billion, roughly half of the aid package, will go to the US Department of Defense so it can deploy troops to the region and send defense equipment to Ukraine.”

As enormous as those sums already are, they were dwarfed by the Biden administration’s announcement on April 28 that it “is asking Congress for $33 billion in funding to respond to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, more than double the $14 billion in support authorized so far.” The White House itself acknowledges that the vast majority of that new spending package will go to the purchase of weaponry and other military assets: “$20.4 billion in additional security and military assistance for Ukraine and for U.S. efforts to strengthen European security in cooperation with our NATO allies and other partners in the region.”

It is difficult to put into context how enormous these expenditures are — particularly since the war is only ten weeks old, and U.S. officials predict/hope that this war will last not months but years. That ensures that the ultimate amounts will be significantly higher still. 

The amounts allocated thus far — the new Biden request of $33 billion combined with the $14 billion already spent — already exceed the average annual amount the U.S. spent for its own war in Afghanistan ($46 billion). In the twenty-year U.S. war in Afghanistan which ended just eight months ago, there was at least some pretense of a self-defense rationale given the claim that the Taliban had harbored Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda at the time of the 9/11 attack. Now the U.S. will spend more than that annual average after just ten weeks of a war in Ukraine that nobody claims has any remote connection to American self-defense.

Even more amazingly, the total amount spent by the U.S. on the Russia/Ukraine war in less than three months is close to Russia’s total military budget for the entire year ($65.9 billion). While Washington depicts Russia as some sort of grave and existential menace to the U.S., the reality is that the U.S. spends more than ten times on its military what Russia spends on its military each year; indeed, the U.S. spends three times more than the second-highest military spender, China, and more than the next twelve countries combined.

But as gargantuan as Biden’s already-spent and newly requested sums are — for a ten-week war in which the U.S. claims not to be a belligerent — it was apparently woefully inadequate in the eyes of the bipartisan establishment in Congress, who is ostensibly elected to serve the needs and interests of American citizens, not Ukrainians. Leaders of both parties instantly decreed that Biden’s $33 billion request was not enough. They thus raised it to $40 billion — a more than 20% increase over the White House’s request — and are now working together to create an accelerated procedure to ensure immediate passage and disbursement of these weapons and funds to the war zone in Ukraine. “Time is of the essence – and we cannot afford to wait,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a letter to House members, adding: “This package, which builds on the robust support already secured by Congress, will be pivotal in helping Ukraine defend not only its nation but democracy for the world.” (See update below).

We have long ago left the realm of debating why it is in the interest of American citizens to pour our country’s resources into this war, to say nothing of risking a direct war and possibly catastrophic nuclear escalation with Russia, the country with the largest nuclear stockpile, with the US close behind. Indeed, one could argue that the U.S. government entered this war and rapidly escalated its involvement without this critical question — which should be fundamental to any policy decision of the U.S. government — being asked at all. 

This omission — a failure to address how the interests of ordinary Americans are served by the U.S. government’s escalating role in this conflict — is particularly glaring given the steadfast and oft-stated view of former President Barack Obama that Ukraine is and always will be of vital interest to Russia, but is not of vital interest to the U.S. For that reason, Obama repeatedly resisted bipartisan demands that he send lethal arms to Ukraine, a step he was deeply reluctant to take due to his belief that the U.S. should not provoke Moscow over an interest as remote as Ukraine (ironically, Trump — who was accused by the U.S. media for years of being a Kremlin asset, controlled by Putin through blackmail — did send lethal arms to Ukraine despite how provocative doing so was to Russia).

While it is extremely difficult to isolate any benefit to ordinary American citizens from all of this, it requires no effort to see that there is a tiny group of Americans who do benefit greatly from this massive expenditure of funds. That is the industry of weapons manufacturers. So fortunate are they that the White House has met with them on several occasions to urge them to expand their capacity to produce sophisticated weapons so that the U.S. government can buy them in massive quantities:

Top U.S. defense officials will meet with the chief executives of the eight largest U.S. defense contractors to discuss industry’s capacity to meet Ukraine’s weapons needs if the war with Russia continues for years.

Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks told reporters Tuesday she plans to participate in a classified roundtable with defense CEOs on Wednesday to discuss “what can we do to help them, what do they need to generate supply”….

“We will discuss industry proposals to accelerate production of existing systems and develop new, modernized capabilities critical to the Department’s ongoing security assistance to Ukraine and long-term readiness of U.S. and ally/partner forces,” the official added.

On May 3, Biden visited a Lockheed Martin facility (see lead photo) and “praised the… plant that manufactures Javelin anti-tank missiles, saying their work was critical to the Ukrainian war effort and to the defense of democracy itself.”

Indeed, by transferring so much military equipment to Ukraine, the U.S. has depleted its own stockpiles, necessitating their replenishment with mass government purchases. One need not be a conspiracy theorist to marvel at the great fortune of this industry, having lost their primary weapons market just eight months ago when the U.S. war in Afghanistan finally ended, only to now be gifted with an even greater and more lucrative opportunity to sell their weapons by virtue of the protracted and always-escalating U.S. role in Ukraine. Raytheon, the primary manufacturer of Javelins along with Lockheed, has been particularly fortunate that its large stockpile, no longer needed for Afghanistan, is now being ordered in larger-than-ever quantities by its former Board member, now running the Pentagon, for shipment to Ukraine. Their stock prices have bulged nicely since the start of the war:

But how does any of this benefit the vast majority of Americans? Does that even matter? As of 2020, almost 30 million Americans are without any health insurance. Over the weekend, USA Today warned of “the ongoing infant formula shortage,” in which “nearly 40% of popular baby formula brands were sold out at retailers across the U.S. during the week starting April 24.” So many Americans are unable to afford college for their children that close to a majority are delaying plans or eliminating them all together. Meanwhile, “monthly poverty remained elevated in February 2022, with a 14.4 percent poverty rate for the total US population….Overall, 6 million more individuals were in poverty in February relative to December.” The latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau found that “approximately 42.5 million Americans [are] living below the poverty line.” Americans with diabetes often struggle to buy life-saving insulin. And on and on and on.

Now, if the U.S. were invaded or otherwise attacked by another country, or its vital interests were directly threatened, one would of course expect the U.S. government to expend large sums in order to protect and defend the national security of the country and its citizens. But can anyone advance a cogent argument, let alone a persuasive one, that Americans are somehow endangered by the war in Ukraine? Clearly, they are far more endangered by the U.S. response to the war in Ukraine than the war itself; after all, a nuclear confrontation between the U.S. and Russia has long been ranked by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists as one of the two greatest threats facing humanity.

One would usually expect the American left, or whatever passes it for these days, to be indignant about the expenditure of tens of billions of dollars for weapons while ordinary Americans suffer. But the American left, such that it exists, is barely visible when it comes to debates over the war in Ukraine, while American liberals stand in virtual unity with the establishment wing of the Republican Party behind the Biden administration in support for the escalating U.S. role in the war in Ukraine. A few stray voices (such as Noam Chomsky) have joined large parts of the international leftin urging a diplomatic solution in lieu of war and criticizing Biden for insufficient efforts to forge one, but the U.S. left and American liberals are almost entirely silent if not supportive.

That has left the traditionally left-wing argument about war opposition to the populist right. “You can’t find baby formula in the United States right now but Congress is voting today to send $40 billion to Ukraine,” said Donald Trump, Jr. on Tuesday, echoing what one would expect to hear from the 2016 version of Bernie Sanders or the pre-victory AOC. “In the America LAST $40 BILLION Ukraine FIRST bill that we are voting on tonight, there is authorization for funds to be given to the CIA for who knows what and who knows how much? But NO BABY FORMULA for American mothers!” explained Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). Christian Walker, the conservative influencer and son of GOP Senate candidate Herschel Walker in Georgia, today observed: “Biden should go apply to be the President of Ukraine since he clearly cares more about them than the U.S.” Chomsky himself caused controversy last week when he said that there is only one statesman of any stature in the West urging a diplomatic solution “and his name is Donald J. Trump.”

Meanwhile, the only place where dissent is heard over the Biden administration’s war policy is on the 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. programs on Fox News, hosted, respectively, by Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham, who routinely demand to know how ordinary Americans are benefiting from this increasing U.S. involvement. On CNN, NBC, and in the op-ed pages of The New York Times and The Washington Post, there is virtually lockstep unity in favor of the U.S. role in this war; the only question that is permitted, as usual, is whether the U.S. is doing enough or whether it should do more. 

That the U.S. has no legitimate role to play in this war, or that its escalating involvement comes at the expense of American citizens, the people they are supposed to be serving, provokes immediate accusations that one is spreading Russian propaganda and is a Kremlin agent. That is therefore an anti-war view that is all but prohibited in those corporate liberal media venues. Meanwhile, mainstream Democratic House members, such as Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), are now openly talking about the war in Ukraine as if it is the U.S.’s own:

Whatever else is true, the claim with which we are bombarded by the corporate press — the two parties agree on nothing; they are constantly at each other’s throats; they have radically different views of the world — is patently untrue, at least when it comes time for the U.S. to join in new wars. Typically, what we see in such situations is what we are seeing now: the establishment wings of both parties are in complete lockstep unity, always breathlessly supporting the new proposed U.S. role in any new war, eager to empty the coffers of the U.S. Treasury and transfer it to the weapons industry while their constituents suffer.

One can believe that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is profoundly unjust and has produced horrific outcomes while still questioning what legitimate interests the U.S. has in participating in this war to this extent. Even if one fervently believes that helping Ukrainians fight Russia is a moral good, surely the U.S. government should be prioritizing the ability of its own citizens to live above the poverty line, have health insurance, send their kids to college, and buy insulin and baby formula.

There are always horrific wars raging, typically with a clear aggressor, but that does not mean that the U.S. can or should assume responsibility for the war absent its own vital interests and the interests of its citizens being directly at stake. In what conceivable sense are American citizens benefiting from this enormous expenditure of their resources and the increasing energy and attention being devoted by their leaders to Ukraine rather than to their lives and the multi-pronged deprivations that define them?

Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald is a journalist, former constitutional lawyer, and author of four New York Times bestselling books on politics and law. His most recent book, “No Place to Hide,” is about the U.S. surveillance state and his experiences reporting on the Snowden documents around the world. His forthcoming book, to be published in April, 2021, is about Brazilian history and current politics, with a focus on his experience in reporting a series of exposés in 2019 and 2020 which exposed high-level corruption by powerful officials in the government of President Jair Bolsonaro, which subsequently attempted to prosecute him for that reporting. 


  1. The US/NATO narrative of the Russia/Ukraine war is a like a cliché -filled, “patriotic” Netflix war movie, only the bullets and the bodies are real.

    1. @Gala

      “only the bullets and the bodies are real.”

      True That!

      The Russian bullets and their Ukrainian victims’ bodies…

  2. It’s been clear that military weapons manufacturers and dealers profit from war. But what about companies that would benefit from worldwide sanctions against Russia? For example, what companies are poised to profit as Russian oil and gas exports are shut down? The EU is a BIG market? Will U.S. companies jump in? What does Burma stand to gain – or lose? Hmmm…

  3. The biggest beneficiaries from the US unflinching and unapologetic military support of Ukraine are the Ukrainian people. Period!

    The Ukrainian choice (that is enabled by the US support) between subjugation to the colonial whines of an anti-democratic authoritarian madman and their own democratic instincts and aspirations should be a no brainer for left-ish Neo Progressive pundits like Greenwald, but for some mysterious reason does not move them from their incessant ‘anti everything’ vitriol.

    I guess Taibbi’s “Hate Inc.” was a self portrait for the lot…

    1. Anti-democratic authoritarian madman? Are you referring to Joe Biden? What is it you’re trying to say? What is a Neo-progressive pundit? You seem to agree that the US government should spend $40 billion dollars to assist a country few have known existed before the present conflict while people in need in this country go begging.

  4. I’ll tell you who benefits, the arms dealers worldwide, the coffin manufacturers, all businesses associated with the KILLING MACHINE., . Just as the government refused to tell the American people of all of their options with Covid in addition to the Vaccine, it
    is failing to engage in efforts to effectuate Peace in Ukraine, instead opting to see more people slaughtered no matter who they are, and professing a holier than thou attitude when in fact the US has as much blood on its hands as Russia or any other nation.

  5. With the irony of fate, Putin has done Zelensky a favor by demilitarizing the ultra-right-wing extremists who, since he was elected, prevented him from leading the country and concluding a peace deal with Russia, that the Ukrainians wanted and that he had promised in the election campaign.

    USA did not help him but chose to support the ultra right-wingers in a proxy war against Russia, even though Russia in no way poses a military threat to NATO, so imagine if USA in a Obama-style had chosen to say, we have your back, Zelensky, boots on the ground and a signed peace agreement, what beacon of light for democracy and freedom, a USA that the people of the world could look up to and admire and what competitor to that could Russia be?.

    But now USA has to hide the lack of format and sinister motives in a total demonization of Putin and what is Russian, with the addition of an indignant and hypocritical fig leaf that one must not invade, as well as a very costly saber-rattling, so Putin not occupy the whole of Europe as they say.

    But why not seize the moment in time as Whitney Houston sings so beautifully and here one may have to be inspired by the stutter of Biden, because some researchers say, stutter arises as a result of a child experience where there is demands, they on the given time not can cope.

    There is more emphasis on strength than spaciousness and it is, so to speak, not possible for them to seize the moment in time and therefore they stutter, but they might as well react outwardly and give in to fight , to combat the high demands, by proxy.

    So when the United States so fiercely wants to fight with Russia by proxy, it may be because inequality has become so great that it is to difficult to fullfil the American dream, other than in an ideological military crusade against a Russia there is no real threat.

    So the USA has become a stutter and the solution is to fight inequality, it is the USA’s moment in time, seize it, and may God be with you.

  6. I’m tired of the warmongers tired use of “defending democracy” every time they cheer on another war. They said it about Vietnam. They said it about fighting the Red Path in Peru. They said it every time we invaded another Central American country to overthrow their democratically-elected governments (which made the mistake of being socialist parties that cared about their own people).
    They said it about every country in the Middle East that they bombed.
    Now they’re trotting it out about Ukraine. Doesn’t anyone else get tired of it too, or are we all so brainwashed with propaganda that we unquestionably accept it?

    1. or, ye could look at recent ukrainian elections, deemed free and fair by all international observers, and compare them to russian elections… which are not…. and draw yer own conclusions… if ye can do that. [draw yer own conclusions….]

      1. Yet we overthrew the Ukrainian leadership during the Maidan coup, and in case you’re still sleeping our elections are absolutely not free and fair in the least. To say we’re no role model is an understatement; America is a flat-out hypocrite, cynical to the core. And too many American citizens are still too stupid to realize what’s going on.

    2. Yep Susan. We “defend” something that we ourselves don’t even have. We’re the biggest hypocrites on earth, maybe in world history. Cynicism on steroids.

  7. Who benefits? Anyone with their finger in the military pie. Who loses? Everyone else…

  8. Do weapons manufacturers have foibles? Does it matter where the weapons end up as long as they work efficiently, and help make their investors reach their targets. No it doesn’t and even if a portion of those weapons were going to Russia, investors would still be making enormous profits and that’s just the way it is. Does it matter to weapons manufacturers if their weapons target innocent people. No. Does it matter if millions of people continue to be persecuted as a result of the actions of investors. No. Go Team USA.

  9. Greenwald, back to your civet excreted coffee.

    “One can believe that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is profoundly unjust and has produced horrific outcomes while still questioning what legitimate interests the U.S. has in participating in this war to this extent. Even ifd like one fervently believes that helping Ukrainians fight Russia is a moral good, surely the U.S. government should be prioritizing the ability of its own citizens to live above the poverty line, have health insurance, send their kids to college, and buy insulin and baby formula.”

    These libertarian media mutts like Greenwald like to dice and slice rhetoric, and it gets old, listening to Greenwald pontificate, really, with no true voice of the people who know going into Ukraine by the Brave Russians should have happened years ago.

    But Greenwald likes both sides of his bread buttered..

    Oh, those viruses:

    Russia attacked Azovstal to eliminate the US-NATO psychopaths in the bunker under the Azovstal plant (after Russia let the civilians quit the plant through a corridor which Azov tried to block, a war crime):

    What can the Imprisoned Canadian General Tell?

    ”Canadian ”General Cadieu was in charge of Azovstal’s underground bunkers, including biological laboratory No. 1, where 18 people worked with deadly viruses.’

    ”The secrets shrouding this industrial facility and the “skeletons in the closet” lurking in its underground shelters have already been revealed in an investigation by Palestinian journalist and writer Nabil Salem: “All this is happening against the background of reports about the existence of a special room under the mill, which houses the secret headquarters of the North Atlantic Alliance with the number pit_40 for the production of biological weapons. In addition to a number of NATO officers, 240 foreign researchers of various nationalities – from the United States, Germany, Canada, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Sweden, Austria, Poland, Greece, as well as soldiers of the French Legion – are stationed there. It has emerged that this secret headquarters is run by Metabiota company of Hunter Biden, son of US President Joe Biden, and his partner, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenski.”

    ”Although perhaps, given General Trevor Cadieu’s direct involvement in US biological laboratories in Ukraine, he may be able to add something to the UK-based The Exposé’s investigation into the direct criminal involvement of the US and Ukraine in the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic…”


    Lieutenant General Trevor Cadieu and Azovstal

    ”The report made reference to Cadieu being in charge 18 lab-assistants working on deadly viruses at Biolab 1. Subsequent reports seem to be based on the initial 360° channel report and internet leaks. Svetlana Nikolaevna gave the most thorough account but was unable to reveal her source, only saying that it was from somebody on the front line and that no official statement had been made.

    She said that the laboratory Cadieu supervised was working on dangerous viruses such as Ebola and Nipah. The importance of the Canadian Lieutenant’s capture is significant, since Svetlana Nikolaevna states that four helicopters and two boats were sent to rescue him, all destroyed by the armed forces of the Russian Federation.

    Her source informed that Cadieu had been taken to Lefortovo (FSB investigation department) Moscow awaiting trial by military tribunal. She believes that the Azovstal plant could hold documents relating to the genocide, murder and tortures alleged to have taken place at the complex.”


    And now, ground temperatures in India, 143 F?

    Schools are letting out because of air temps of 114 F?

    And this is it for the leadership of the perverted, all those Offensive Weaons Companies under female CEO-ship, and that other perversion, Gen. Austin, brought to you by Raytheon. No deep analysis on how messed up the globe is?

    As Scott Ritter stated: “Biden could be a hero, get his dems elected, if ye called up ZioLensky and said, ‘Stop the military actions. I have Putin on the other end of the cell signal. I am asking him to stop military action, get back to the table, find out what Russia needs to be safe, and then, that’s that. Russia needs the end to the threat, and those Nazi’s need to go the way of the Dodo, or get asylum in Idaho and Utah. ”

  10. Why should I pay to arm Ukraine in their war against Russia? I already pay to help the Saudis and Emeratis in their war on the Houtis and Yemeni civilians. My tax dollars go to oppressing Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran. I would rather the US govt fund relief programs in at home to relieve poverty, prevent disease, and improve public primary, secondary, and university education. I just think that all those billions could go to providing free community college educations to all young people. But this cannot be, so long as the rich and the war profiteers suck up the available funds. It just makes you want to scream and cry and pull your hair out. Tar and feather that bastard Biden. I vow never to vote for the democrat party as long as I live.

  11. How embarrassing for this site that Tucker Carlson’s millionaire BFF Glenn Greenwald is a continued presence. The only thing more embarrassing would be if some of your columnists’ large volumes of work promoting “freedom” had been underwritten by a violent autocratic dictator who crushed the domestic press in his own country, oh wait, oops!

  12. Biden couldn’t possibly have known all the pork-barrel deals those congress critters had cooked up with their corporate cronies. I’m actually surprised our representatives restrained themselves to $40 billion. But there’s always the inevitable cost overruns to count on more moolah at the back end, with markups by military contractors typified by a toilet seat selling for thousands (must be one of those ‘smart seats’ that wipes your arse, just like these crooks probably do with Franklins).

  13. Let’s not fool ourselves here. If Trump was still in office, the war in Ukraine would still be happening, and it would be the Democrats who would be dishonestly crying out about baby food shortages and whatnot. Same shoe, other foot. Same as it’s always been. Rinse & repeat.

    1. Marble Rye, if Trump was in power, he would have agreed with his best bud and not let Ukraine into Nato as he hates Zelensky and Ukraine.
      We all know Donnie is very vindictive, so he easily denies Ukraine and the war would not even have started.
      Donald is much less of a war enthusiast than old Joe, Joe’s compatriots will now seek the downfall of Russia and Putin, then target China for destruction as PRC will be all alone.

      If the west is very willing to pay extravagant prices for non Russian energy, then WESTERNERS will also pay very extraordinary high prices for non-China products.
      The world has ended most of Gobalization and we will return to the era of pre 1980s economy.
      The world is headed in a very different direction starting this year with USA and Nato dictating the direction and paths whether you like it or not.
      If we survive without a nuclear war, and if USA avoids a civil war, The next century will have grave and great changes.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: